Liderazgo destructivo en la transformación digital: estrategias éticas para ponderar la integridad sobre la visibilidad y los resultados

Carlos Santiago-Torner

doi:10.22490/25392786.10739

Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2025)

Publicado 2025-08-04

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Estrategia Organizacional

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Revista

La revista proporciona acceso abierto inmediato a su contenido, basado en el principio de ofrecer al público un acceso libre a las investigaciones y colaborar a un mayor intercambio global de conocimiento.

Por tanto se acoge a la Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 Atribuciones Reconocimiento – NoComercial – CompartirIgual (by-nc-sa): No se permite un uso comercial de la obra original ni de las posibles obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales se debe hacer con una licencia igual a la que regula la obra original. Para ver más dirigirse a: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

La revista permite el autoarchivo después de publicado con la versión editada por la revista tanto en Web personales como repositorios institucionales y de área de conocimiento, siempre y cuando se realice la cita directa a la revista y se de el URL que dirige al artículo en el espacio Web de la revista. No solicita ningún tipo de embargo de los contenidos gestionados.

Para toda gestión la Revista Estrategia Organizacional se acoje al Código de Conducta COPE para Editores de Revistas y algunas Directrices sobre las Mejores Prácticas de COPE. Se recomienda leer el Código de ética en la sección sobre la revista. (Ver código)

Autor

Los contenidos de los artículos deben ser inéditos, no deben estar en evaluación en otra institución, el contenido no puede ser enajenado de terceros, no deben tener limitación legal o contractual que le prohiba autorizar su publicación en acceso abierto y medio impreso o digital.

La consecución de derechos de reproducción de todo el material gráfico es responsabilidad de los autores. Por ello, deben enviar las autorizaciones para la publicación y uso de ese material

Cada autor debe firmar la Carta de Cesión de Derechos a favor de la Universidad Nacional Abierta y A Distancia (UNAD) y la Revista Estrategia Organizacional.

Los autores de los artículos seleccionados para publicación deben leer y conocer el código de ética de la revista. En todos los casos el Editor y Comité editorial declaran que las opiniones expuestas son exclusividad y responsabilidad de los autores.

Política de preservación

La Revista Estrategia Organizacional preserva archivos a través de los servidores de la hemeroteca de la UNAD con la plataforma OJS. Este posee la herramienta PKP PLN que permite preservar el contenido de la revista independientemente de donde se encuentre alojado. Gracias a la Red privada de LOCKSS. Se puede ampliar la información en: https://pkp.sfu.ca/2016/08/08/pkp-lockss-pln-update

Adicionalmente, la revista cuenta con protocolos de interoperabilidad OAI-PMH: Open Archives Initiative-Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Los detalles pueden consultarse en el siguiente link: https://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/index.php/revista-estrategica-organizacio/oai.

Artículo de Investigación

Liderazgo destructivo en la transformación digital: estrategias éticas para ponderar la integridad sobre la visibilidad y los resultados

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/25392786.10739

Carlos Santiago-Torner Universidad de Vic, Universidad Central de Cataluña, España

PDF

XML

HTML

Movil

Resumen
Referencias

Introducción: Esta investigación analítica-crítica examina el papel de los liderazgos destructivos en los procesos de transformación digital, especialmente en entornos híbridos. Más allá de enfoques que idealizan el liderazgo, se estudia cómo los estilos autoritarios, laissez-faire, narcisistas y tóxicos deterioran la salud organizacional, debilitan la legitimidad institucional y amenazan la sostenibilidad del cambio. Metodología: La investigación se fundamenta en un análisis teórico-documental de carácter interpretativo y reflexivo, apoyado en literatura reciente y guiado por un enfoque constructivista y ético propio de las ciencias humanas. Resultados: El estudio evidencia que estos estilos no constituyen simples desviaciones individuales, sino configuraciones estructurales que erosionan las relaciones laborales, fomentan culturas del miedo y restringen la innovación bajo discursos de eficiencia. En consecuencia, su permanencia en los entornos híbridos compromete la viabilidad de la transformación digital, lo que demanda su identificación y desarticulación mediante estrategias de gestión que garanticen procesos de cambio auténticos y sostenibles.

Palabras clave: liderazgo autoritario, liderazgo laissez-faire, liderazgo narcisista, liderazgo tóxico, liderazgo destructivo, transformación digital, estrategias de gestión, salud emocional

Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x

Ågotnes, K. W., Nielsen, M. B., Skogstad, A., Gjerstad, J., & Einarsen, S. V. (2024). The role of leadership practices in the relationship between role stressors and exposure to bullying behaviours: A longitudinal moderated mediation design. Work & Stress, 38(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2023.2226635

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188

Appelbaum, S. H., & Roy-Girard, D. (2007). Toxins in the workplace: Affect on organizations and employees. Corporate Governance, 7(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710727087

Badar, K., Aboramadan, M., & Plimmer, G. (2023). Despotic vs narcissistic leadership: Differences in their relationship to emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(4), 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-12-2022-0210

Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2017). Time reclaimed: Temporality and the experience of meaningful work. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015604100

Banks, G. C., Dionne, S. D., Mast, M. S., & Sayama, H. (2022). Leadership in the digital era: A review of who, what, when, where, and why. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5), 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101634

Battiston, D., Blanes i Vidal, J., & Kirchmaier, T. (2021). Face-to-face communication in organizations. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(2), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa060

Behie, S. W., Pasman, H. J., Khan, F. I., Shell, K., Alarfaj, A., El-Kady, A. H., & Hernandez, M. (2023). Leadership 4.0: The changing landscape of industry management in the smart digital era. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 172, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.014

Braun, S., Aydin, N., Frey, D., & Peus, C. (2018). Leader narcissism predicts malicious envy and supervisor-targeted counterproductive work behavior: Evidence from field and experimental research. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 725–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3224-5

Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(2), 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12253

Buch, R., Martinsen, Ø. L., & Kuvaas, B. (2015). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior: The mediating role of economic leader–member exchange relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813515302

Choi, Y., & Phan, W. M. J. (2022). Narcissistic leaders: The good, the bad, and recommendations. Organizational Dynamics, 51(3), 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100868

Ciulla, J. B. (2020). The importance of leadership in shaping business values. In The Search for Ethics in Leadership, Business, and Beyond (pp. 153–163). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38463-0_10

Desgourdes, C., Hasnaoui, J., Umar, M., & Feliu, J. G. (2024). Decoding laissez-faire leadership: An in-depth study on its influence over employee autonomy and well-being at work. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(2), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00927-5

Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.002

Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2016). The nature and outcomes of destructive leadership behavior in organizations. In Risky Business (pp. 323–349). Routledge.

Faeq, D. K. (2025). Narcissistic leadership, workplace bullying, turnover intention, and creative performance: A study of nurses. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 898. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03479-x

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.

Grijalva, E., & Harms, P. D. (2014). Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0048

Grint, K., & Jones, O. S. (2022). Leadership: Limits and possibilities. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006

Hopkins, J. C., & Figaro, K. A. (2021). The great resignation: An argument for hybrid leadership. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(4), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.37391/IJBMR.090402

Khorram-Manesh, A., Goniewicz, K., & Burkle, F. M., Jr. (2024). The impacts of narcissistic leadership on achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A scoping review. Challenges, 15(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15030037

Klasmeier, K. N., Schleu, J. E., Millhoff, C., Poethke, U., & Bormann, K. C. (2022). On the destructiveness of laissez-faire versus abusive supervision: A comparative, multilevel investigation of destructive forms of leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1968375

Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., ... & Van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716

Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388

Kutsyuruba, B., & Walker, K. D. (2016). The destructive effects of distrust: Leaders as brokers of trust in organizations. In The Dark Side of Leadership: Identifying and Overcoming Unethical Practice in Organizations (pp. 133–154). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3660201726

Labrague, L. J. (2024). Toxic leadership and its relationship with outcomes on the nursing workforce and patient safety: A systematic review. Leadership in Health Services, 37(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhs-06-2023-0047

Laschinger, H. K. S., & Fida, R. (2015). Linking nurses’ perceptions of patient care quality to job satisfaction: The role of authentic leadership and empowering professional practice environments. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(5), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000198

Li, P., Yin, K., Shi, J., Damen, T. G., & Taris, T. W. (2024). Are bad leaders indeed bad for employees? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies between destructive leadership and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 191(2), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05449-2

Mackey, J. D., Ellen, B. P., III, McAllister, C. P., & Alexander, K. C. (2021). The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research. Journal of Business Research, 132, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.037

Magnavita, N., Tripepi, G., & Chiorri, C. (2021). Telecommuting, off-time work, and intrusive leadership in workers’ well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073330

Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S120–S137. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1888

Megheirkouni, M., & Mejheirkouni, A. (2020). Leadership development trends and challenges in the twenty-first century: Rethinking the priorities. Journal of Management Development, 39(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-04-2019-0114

Mergen, A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2021). Understanding the followers of toxic leaders: Toxic illusio and personal uncertainty. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12240

Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., ... & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during COVID-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911

Nevicka, B., De Hoogh, A. H., Van Vianen, A. E., Beersma, B., & McIlwain, D. (2011). All I need is a stage to shine: Narcissists’ leader emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 910–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.011

Northouse, P. G. (2025). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Nunes, A., & Palma-Moreira, A. (2024). Toxic leadership and turnover intentions: The role of burnout syndrome. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120340

Ofei, A. M. A., Poku, C. A., Paarima, Y., Barnes, T., & Kwashie, A. A. (2023). Toxic leadership behaviour of nurse managers and turnover intentions: The mediating role of job satisfaction. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 374. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01539-8

Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001

Palvimo, T., Vauhkonen, A., & Hult, M. (2023). The associations among destructive leadership, job demands and resources, and burnout among nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study. Journal of Nursing Management, 2023(1), 4289450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4289450

Patapan, H. (2022). The modern manual of authoritarian leadership. Democratization, 29(5), 958–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2023500

Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010379308

Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I., & Venditti, M. (2023). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 841–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y

Pletzer, J. L., Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2024). Constructive and destructive leadership in job demands–resources theory: A meta-analytic test of the motivational and health-impairment pathways. Organizational Psychology Review, 14(1), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231197519

Priesemuth, M., & Schminke, M. (2024). Toxic work climates: An integrative review and development of a new construct and theoretical framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(9), 1355–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001188

Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005

Ryan, P., Odhiambo, G., & Wilson, R. (2021). Destructive leadership in education: A transdisciplinary critical analysis of contemporary literature. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1640892

Santiago-Torner, C. (2023a). Relación entre liderazgo ético y motivación intrínseca: El rol mediador de la creatividad y el múltiple efecto moderador del compromiso de continuidad. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 36(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.7406

Santiago-Torner, C. (2023b). Teletrabajo y clima ético: El efecto mediador de la autonomía laboral y del compromiso organizacional. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 36(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46661/rev.metodoscuant.econ.empresa.7540

Santiago-Torner, C., Corral-Marfil, J. A., & Tarrats-Pons, E. (2024). The relationship between ethical leadership and emotional exhaustion in a virtual work environment: A moderated mediation model. Systems, 12(11), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110454

Santiago-Torner, C., González-Carrasco, M., & Miranda-Ayala, R. (2025). Relationship between ethical climate and burnout: A new approach through work autonomy. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020121

Shan, G., Wang, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Guo, S., & Li, Y. (2022). Authoritarian leadership and nurse presenteeism: The role of workload and leader identification. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01119-2

Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 193–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574906

Sischka, P. E., Schmidt, A. F., & Steffgen, G. (2021). The effect of competition and passive avoidant leadership style on the occurrence of workplace bullying. Personnel Review, 50(2), 535–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2019-0469

Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80

Skogstad, A., Hetland, J., Glasø, L., & Einarsen, S. (2014). Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity. Work & Stress, 28(4), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.957362

Stead, V., Elliott, C., & Gardiner, R. A. (2021). Leadership legitimacy and the mobilization of capital(s): Disrupting politics and reproducing heteronormativity. Leadership, 17(6), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211018314

Thoroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., Padilla, A., & Lunsford, L. (2018). Destructive leadership: A critique of leader-centric perspectives and toward a more holistic definition. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3257-9

Tourish, D. (2019). Management studies in crisis: Fraud, deception and meaningless research. Cambridge University Press.

Usman, M., Ali, M., Yousaf, Z., Anwar, F., Waqas, M., & Khan, M. A. S. (2020). The relationship between laissez-faire leadership and burnout: Mediation through work alienation and the moderating role of political skill. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 37(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1568

Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: Identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316681446

Wolor, C. W., Ardiansyah, A., Rofaida, R., Nurkhin, A., & Rababah, M. A. (2022). Impact of toxic leadership on employee performance. Health Psychology Research, 10(4), 57551. https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.57551

Ye, S., Yang, Y., Wang, W., & Zhou, X. (2022). Linking ethical leadership to employees’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 50(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.11636

Zhang, S., Wang, H., & He, Q. (2024). Performance pressure and employee presenteeism: The joint effects of authoritarian leadership and independent self-construal. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030236

Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Akhtar, M. N., & Wang, Y. (2022). Authoritarian leadership and cyberloafing: A moderated mediation model of emotional exhaustion and power distance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1010845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010845

Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: The role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2

Licencia

Cómo citar

Santiago-Torner, C. (2025). Liderazgo destructivo en la transformación digital: estrategias éticas para ponderar la integridad sobre la visibilidad y los resultados. Revista Estrategia Organizacional, 14(2), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.22490/25392786.10739

Descargar cita

Almétricas

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...