Published 2011-04-14
license
Artículo producto de Investigación

A comparison of learning, attitude and scientific reasoning when teaching chemistry in distance and traditional education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/25391887.744
Alba Janeth Pinzón Rosas Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

This research compares students’ learning, attitude and scientific reasoning in the chemistry course at two universities from Bogotá, Colombia. One of them has a distance education system and the other one follows a traditional education method. Both universities have different teaching methods and their students are different too. The distance university is public and its students come from lower and middle strata. The other one is a private university, whose students come from upper middle and high strata. At the distance University there are about 8,000 students while the private one has 2,000 students. According to the results, no significant differences were in any of the variables used depending on the mode of study.

keywords: Attitude, scientific reasoning, learning, distance learning, classroom education.
license
How to Cite
Pinzón Rosas, A. J. (2011). A comparison of learning, attitude and scientific reasoning when teaching chemistry in distance and traditional education. Revista De Investigaciones UNAD, 10(1), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.22490/25391887.744
Metrics
Archivos descargados
238
Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 20269
|

PRIVACY STATEMENT: In accordance with the Personal Data Protection Law (Law 1581 of 2012), the names and email addresses managed by Revista de Investigaciones UNAD will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other individual. Manuscripts submitted to the publication are only accessible to the editorial team and external peer reviewers.

Design and implemented by