Participación de los públicos, inclusión  social e innovación en la Gobernanza de  los Centros de Ciencia en Colombia

Carlos Blanco Valbuena; Sigrid Falla Morales

doi:10.15332/mfjt5e66

v. 16 n. 1 (2023)

Publicado 2025-09-12

licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:

Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).

RIIEP está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.

ARTÍCULOS DE REFLEXIÓN

Participação cidadã, inclusão social e inovação na governança dos centros de ciência na Colômbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/mfjt5e66

Carlos Blanco Valbuena Universidad Santo Tomás

Sigrid Falla Morales Maloka Museo Interactivo-Directora de Arquitectura de Experiencias

PDF (Espanhol)

Resumo
Referências

O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar as práticas tácitas e explícitas rela cionadas à governança dos Centros de Ciência da Colômbia (ccc) a partir da participação do público, inclusão social e inovação, a fim de propor mecanismos e estratégias que fortaleçam as capacidades dos diferentes atores, tenham uma cidadania cada vez mais partici pativa, científica e democrática. Para a identificação da amostra teó rica dos CCCs contamos com as contribuições de Strauss e Corbin (1998). Em uma amostra teórica, os casos são escolhidos para preen cher categorias teóricas e fornecer exemplos de situações extremas e tipos polares (Eisenhardt, 1989). As entrevistas presenciais foram realizadas em profundidade por meio de questionário de perguntas específicas selecionadas de acordo com as variáveis. Os dados foram analisados com técnicas voltadas para o desenvolvimento da teoria a partir das contribuições de (Strauss e Corbin, 1998), conceituando e reduzindo os resultados das entrevistas em categorias comuns, e encontrando relações por meio delas. Os resultados deste estudo estão de acordo com Bandelli et al. (2009), Freeman (2010) e Quick e Bryson (2016), quando afirmam que a participação implica a contri buição direta ou indireta feita por indivíduos ou grupos com capa cidade de influenciar o desenvolvimento de projetos e programas. Concluímos que os cidadãos não participam da toma de decisão em relação à gestão, e isso acontece principalmente porque as estrutu ras internas projetadas são rígidas e gerenciadas por conselheiros e administradores. O artigo é produto original da pesquisa.

palavras-chave: centros de ciência, participação, inclusão social, inovação, governança, cidadãos

Association of Science-Technology Centers. (2008). Association of Science-Technology Centers web site. Retrieved April 10, 2008, from http://www.astc.org/resource/access/index.htm

Bandelli, A. (2014). Assessing scientific citizenship through science centre visitor studies. *Journal of Science Communication.*

Bandelli, A., Konijn, E., & Willems, J. (2009). The need for public participation in the governance of science centers. *Museum Management and Curatorship, 24*(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903073097

Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing “emancipatory” disability research. *Disability and Society, 18*(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/713662197

Bauer, M. (2009). The evolution of public understanding of science—Discourse and comparative evidence. *Science, Technology & Society, 14*(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180901400202

Bevir, M. (2013). *Governance: A very short introduction.* Oxford University Press.

Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. *Public Administration Review, 73*(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x

CEPAL. (2014). *Inclusión social activa: Mejoramiento de las estrategias para superar las condiciones de pobreza.* Seminario bi-regional América Latina – Europa, Nápoles, Italia.

Combe McLean, F. (1994). Marketing in museums: A contextual analysis. In K. Moore (Ed.), *Museum management* (pp. 232–248). Routledge.

Comisión Europea. (2009). *Comunicación de la comisión al parlamento europeo, al consejo, al comité económico y social europeo y al comité de las regiones. Incorporación del desarrollo sostenible en las políticas de la UE: Informe de 2009 sobre la estrategia de la Unión Europea para el desarrollo sostenible.* Bruselas.

Davies, A., & Simon, J. (2012). The value and role of citizen engagement in social innovation. A deliverable of the project *The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe (TEPSIE).* European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, DG Research.

Einsiedel, A. A., & Einsiedel, F. (2004). Museums as agora: Diversifying approaches to engaging publics in research. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo, & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), *Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research* (pp. 73–86). AltaMira Press.

European Commission. (2013). *Social innovation research in Europe: Approaches, trends and future directions.* Directorate-General for Research.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). *Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.* Cambridge University Press.

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. *Public Administration Review, 66*(S1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

Geoghegan, H., Dyke, A., Pateman, R., West, S., & Everett, G. (2016). *Understanding motivations for citizen science.* UKEOF. http://www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources

Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). *Science in public: Communication, culture, and credibility.* Plenum Press.

Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (2014). *Deliberative mini publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process.* ECPR Press.

Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., & Bonn, A. (Eds.). (2018). *Citizen science – Innovation in open science, society and policy.* UCL Press.

Hinchliffe, S., Levidow, L., & Oreszczyn, S. (2014). Engaging cooperative research. *Environment and Planning A, 46*(9), 2080–2094. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130061p

House of Lords. (2000). *Science and society – Science and technology – Third report.* The Stationery Office.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. *Planning Theory and Practice, 5*(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170

Kevin, C. (2008). Cultural inclusion, exclusion and the formative roles of museums. *Museum Management and Curatorship, 23*(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802234078

Lévy-Leblond, J. M. (1992). About misunderstandings about misunderstandings. *Public Understanding of Science, 1*(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/004

Mansbridge, J. (1999). On the idea that participation makes better citizens. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Soltan (Eds.), *Citizen competence and democratic institutions* (pp. 291–325). Penn State University Press.

McLean, K., & Pollock, W. (Eds.). (2007). *Visitor voices in museum exhibitions.* Association of Science and Technology Centers.

Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. *Public Understanding of Science, 10*(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.3109/a036550

Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. *American Review of Public Administration, 40*(4), 376–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009356467

Nyseth, T., Ringholm, T., & Agger, A. (2019). Innovative forms of citizen participation at the fringe of the formal planning system. *Urban Planning, 4*(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i1.1601

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. *Science and Public Policy, 39*(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. M. (2016). Theories of public participation in governance. In J. Torbing & C. Ansell (Eds.), *Handbook on theories of governance.* Edward Elgar.

Rask, M. (2013). The tragedy of citizen deliberation: Two cases of participatory technology assessment. *Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25*(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.751011

Rask, M., Worthington, R., & Lammi, M. (Eds.). (2018). *Public participation, science and society: Tools for dynamic and responsible governance of research and innovation.* Routledge.

Regeer, B. (2004). Wetenschapscommunicatie in de agora: Veranderende relaties tussen wetenschap en samenleving [Science communication in the agora: Changing relationships between science and society]. In C. J. Hamelink, I. van Veen, & J. Willems (Eds.), *Interactieve wetenschapscommunicatie* (pp. 119–137). Uitgeverij Coutinho.

Reich, R. B. (Ed.). (1990). *The power of public ideas.* Harvard University Press.

Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. *American Review of Public Administration, 34*(4), 315–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288

Sandell, R. (2003). Social inclusion, the museum and the dynamics of sectoral change. *Museum & Society, 1*(1), 45–62.

Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. *Ecology and Society, 15*(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03701-150426

Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. *Management Science, 40*(4), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429

World Bank. (2013). *Inclusion matters: The foundation for shared prosperity (Overview).* World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0010-8 License: Creative Commons CC BY 3.0

Zhao, Y., et al. (2015). Public engagement in the governance of science and technology. In *Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development (CASTED).* Beijing.

licença

Como Citar

Blanco Valbuena, C., & Falla Morales, S. (2025). Participação cidadã, inclusão social e inovação na governança dos centros de ciência na Colômbia. Revista Interamericana De Investigación Educación Y Pedagogía RIIEP, 16(1), 269-318. https://doi.org/10.15332/mfjt5e66

Baixar Citação

Almétricas

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

Carlos Blanco Valbuena, Práticas de Criação de Conhecimento e os diferentes tipos de "ba" no programa "Aprenda em Casa com Maloka" , Revista Interamericana de Investigación Educación y Pedagogía RIIEP: v. 17 n. 2 (2024)