Evaluación de un NOOC orientado a la elaboración de contenidos educativos  digitales desde el marco TPACK

Javier Ricardo Guzmán González; Grace Judith Vesga Bravo

doi:10.15332/z1tk0435

v. 17 n. 2 (2024)

Publicado 2025-08-30

licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:

Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).

RIIEP está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.

ARTIGOS PRODUTO DA PESQUISA

Avaliação de um NOOC orientado para o desenvolvimento de conteúdos educativos digitais a partir do quadro TPACK.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/z1tk0435

Javier Ricardo Guzmán González Universidad Antonio Nariño

Grace Judith Vesga Bravo Universidad Antonio Nariño

PDF (Espanhol)

Resumo
Referências

O objetivo deste estudo foi projetar, implementar e avaliar um curso NOOC focado na criação de conteúdo educacional digital sob a orientação do framework TPACK. O curso seguiu as fases instrucionais do modelo ADDIE. A validação do conteúdo do curso foi realizada por professores da disciplina de tecnologia e informática. A implementação e avaliação foram realizadas por meio de estatística descritiva e análise de conteúdo. A validação do conteúdo do curso mostrou que o coeficiente de validade de todas as afirmações estava em níveis adequados. Da análise dos fóruns de reflexão presentes no curso emergiram elementos como motivação, interação e avaliação da aprendizagem ao utilizar conteúdos educacionais digitais nas aulas. Da mesma forma, os professores que realizaram a maioria das atividades do NOOC avaliaram-no positivamente em aspectos como o cumprimento do objetivo, os recursos utilizados e o tempo alocado para o desenvolvimento das atividades. O desenvolvimento de cursos do tipo MOOC, seguindo as fases instrucionais do modelo ADDIE, permite a formação continuada de professores, especificamente no desenvolvimento de conteúdos educativos digitais orientados pelo referencial TPACK. O curso permitiu aos participantes refletir sobre o uso pedagógico da tecnologia, identificando aspectos como a interação que é incentivada com este tipo de ferramentas.

palavras-chave: TPACK, MOOC, ADDIE, integração tecnológica, conteúdos educativos digitais

1. Akun, J. C. A., & Mohamad, F. S. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and the teaching of science: Determiners for professional development. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4272

2. Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2017). Exploring in- and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6113–6131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01053a

3. Aniq, L. N., Drajati, N. A., & Fauziati, E. (2022). Covid-19 outbreak response: Tracing EFL teachers’ beliefs & practices of TPACK in teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46535

4. Azami, H. H. R., & Ibrahim, R. (2019). Development and evaluation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) as a supplementary learning tool: An initial study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(7), 532–537. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100773

5. Ballesteros Ibarra, M. L., Mercado Varela, M. A., García Vázquez, N. J., & Glasserman Morales, L. D. (2020). Teacher professional learning experiences in MOOC: Teachers from Sonora, Mexico who participated in the key learning collection. Texto Livre, 13(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.25099

6. Barroso, J. M., Matos, V. Y., & Aguilar, S. (2019). Análisis de los recursos, usos y competencias tecnológicas del profesorado universitario para comprender y mejorar el proceso de aprendizaje del alumnado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 80(1), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8013466

7. Cabero, J., Roig-Vila, R., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2017). Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares de los futuros docentes según el modelo TPACK. RCUB Revistes Científiques de La Universitat de Barcelona, 32, 73–84. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/16981

8. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2018). Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A cross-sectional study from Spain. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1528997

9. Cejas-León, R., & Navío, A. (2018). ICT training of university teachers. Influential factors on transfer to teacher’s job. Profesorado, 22(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.8002

10. Chieng, Y. E., & Tan, C. K. (2021). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers’ survey and perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517

11. Da Silva, J. B., Bilessimo, S. M., & Machado, L. (2021). Integração de tecnologia na educação: Proposta de modelo para capacitação docente inspirada no TPACK. Educação Em Revista, 37, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/01024698232757

12. Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2021). Fostering the growth of TPACK among international teachers of developing nations through a cultural exchange program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5964

13. Fierro, M., Morales Vásquez, M., Norambuena Díaz, D., Bravo González, B., & Contreras Poblete, P. (2021). Objetivos priorizados del eje de lectura en la región del Maule, Chile: problemáticas y desafíos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 86(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8614295

14. Fuentes, J. L., Albertos, J. E., & Torrano, F. (2019). Towards the mobile-learning in the school: Analysis of critical factors on the use of tablets in Spanish schools. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2019_20_a3

15. Gil-Quintana, J., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2020). Citizenship training through SMOOCs: A participative and intercreative learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208301

16. Golubeva, T. I. (2020). Video conferencing and webinars: Integration of online tools in traditional forms of educational and scientific activities. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 4241–4244. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/11942020

17. Gonzalez, M., & Mohamad, G. A. (2022). Virtual literacy instruction: An investigation of how elementary educators exhibited TPACK during COVID-19 school closures. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202216914

18. Gordillo, A., López-Pernas, S., & Barra, E. (2019). Effectiveness of MOOCs for teachers in safe ICT use training. Comunicar, 27(61), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-08

19. Granados Maguiño, M. A., Romero Vela, S. L., Rengifo Lozano, R. A., & Garcia Mendocilla, G. F. (2020). Technology in the educational process: New scenario [Tecnología en el proceso educativo: Nuevos escenarios]. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(92), 1809–1823. https://n9.cl/p6v0g

20. Herrera Nieves, L., Crisol Moya, E., & Montes Soldado, R. (2019). A MOOC on universal design for learning designed based on the UDL paradigm. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 35. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5508

21. INTEF. (2017). Marco común de competencia digital docente. https://intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017_1024_MarcoComunCompeDigiDoceV2.pdf

22. Istiningsih, I. (2022). Impact of ICT integration on the development of vocational high school teacher TPACK in the digital age 4.0. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6642

23. López-Meneses, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Bernal-Bravo, C., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of massive open online courses (MOOC) in comparison to other teaching models by using socio-educational contexts. Formación Universitaria, 13(6), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.4067/S071850062020000600077

24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

25. Mohamad Nasri, N., Husnin, H., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Halim, L. (2020). Mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: A snapshot from Malaysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers’ education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802582

26. Monjelat, N., Peralta, N., & Martín, P. S. (2020). Saberes y prácticas con TIC: ¿Instrumentalismo o complejidad? Un estudio con maestros de primaria argentinos. Perfiles Educativos, 43(171), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.22201/IISUE.24486167E.2021.171.59225

27. Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Saudagar, F., Pratama, R., Wahyuni, S., Sadikin, A., & Indrayana, B. (2019). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.662

28. Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., Marandi, S. S., & Wang, S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010

29. Novita, R., & Herman, T. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027

30. Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2019). Massive open online courses in the initial training of social science teachers: Experiences, methodological conceptions, and technological use for sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030578

31. Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2020). MOOCs and NOOCs in the training of future geography and history teachers: A comparative cross-sectional study based on the TPACK model. IEEE Access, 8, 4035–4042. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963314

32. Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (2020). EFL teachers’ perceptions on the potential of MOOCs for lifelong learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 15(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2020100101

33. Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & García-Cueto, E. (2014). Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: Avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación [Content validity evidences: Theoretical advances and estimation methods]. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820

34. Rajprasit, K. (2022). Design and development of an English as a global language MOOC to increase global Englishes awareness: Evaluation in a Thai university. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2801-09

35. Ramírez Martinell, A., Casillas Alvarado, M. Á., & Aguirre González, I. R. (2018). Habilitación tecnológica de profesores universitarios y docentes de educación básica. Apertura (Guadalajara, Jal.), 10(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.18381/ap.vl0n2.1368

36. Rap, S., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Aviran, E., Shvarts-Serebro, I., Easa, E., Yonai, E., Waldman, R., & Blonder, R. (2020). An applied research-based approach to support chemistry teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3278–3284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00687

37. Sampaio, D., & Almeida, P. (2016). Pedagogical strategies for the integration of augmented reality in ICT teaching and learning processes. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.240

38. Sosa-Díaz, M. J., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2020). Massive open online courses (MOOC) within the framework of international developmental cooperation as a strategy to achieve sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310187

39. Tiba, C., & Condy, J. (2021). Newly qualified teachers’ integration of technology during curriculum delivery. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.297.309

40. Villarreal-Villa, S., García-Guliany, J., Hernández-Palma, H., & Steffens-Sanabria, E. (2019). Teacher competences and transformations in education in the digital age. Formación Universitaria, 12(6), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600003

41. Walan, S. (2020). Embracing digital technology in science classrooms—Secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6

42. Zeng, Y. (2022). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology use among secondary teachers teaching Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) in Australia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n2p15

licença

Como Citar

Guzmán González, J. R., & Vesga Bravo, G. J. (2025). Avaliação de um NOOC orientado para o desenvolvimento de conteúdos educativos digitais a partir do quadro TPACK . Revista Interamericana De Investigación Educación Y Pedagogía RIIEP, 17(2), 53-82. https://doi.org/10.15332/z1tk0435

Baixar Citação

Almétricas

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...