Evaluación de un NOOC orientado a la elaboración de contenidos educativos  digitales desde el marco TPACK

Javier Ricardo Guzmán González; Grace Judith Vesga Bravo

doi:10.15332/z1tk0435

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024)

Published 2025-08-30

license

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Los autores mantienen los derechos sobre los artículos y por tanto son libres de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra bajo las condiciones siguientes:

Reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el autor o el licenciante (pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra).

RIIEP está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

La Universidad Santo Tomás conserva los derechos patrimoniales de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia anteriormente mencionada.

ARTICLES PRODUCT OF THE INVESTIGATION

Evaluation a NOOC oriented to the development of digital educational contents from the TPACK framework.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/z1tk0435

Javier Ricardo Guzmán González Universidad Antonio Nariño

Grace Judith Vesga Bravo Universidad Antonio Nariño

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate a NOOC course focused on the creation of digital educational content under the guidance of the TPACK framework. The course followed the instructional phases of the ADDIE model. A validation of the course content was carried out by teachers of the technology and computer science subject. Implementation and evaluation were carried out using descriptive statistics and content analysis. The validation of the course content showed that the validity coefficient of all statements was at adequate levels. From the analysis of the reflection forums present in the course, elements such as motivation, interaction and evaluation of learning when using digital educational content in classes emerged. Likewise, the teachers who carried out the majority of the NOOC activities evaluated it positively in aspects such as fulfillment of the objective, the resources used, and the time allocated for the development of the activities. The development of MOOC-type courses, following the instructional phases of the ADDIE model, enables the continued training of teachers, specifically in the development of digital educational content guided by the TPACK framework. The course allowed participants to reflect on the pedagogical use of technology, identifying aspects such as the interaction that is encouraged with this type of tools.

keywords: TPACK, MOOC, ADDIE, technology integration, digital educational content

1. Akun, J. C. A., & Mohamad, F. S. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and the teaching of science: Determiners for professional development. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4272

2. Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2017). Exploring in- and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6113–6131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01053a

3. Aniq, L. N., Drajati, N. A., & Fauziati, E. (2022). Covid-19 outbreak response: Tracing EFL teachers’ beliefs & practices of TPACK in teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46535

4. Azami, H. H. R., & Ibrahim, R. (2019). Development and evaluation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) as a supplementary learning tool: An initial study. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(7), 532–537. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100773

5. Ballesteros Ibarra, M. L., Mercado Varela, M. A., García Vázquez, N. J., & Glasserman Morales, L. D. (2020). Teacher professional learning experiences in MOOC: Teachers from Sonora, Mexico who participated in the key learning collection. Texto Livre, 13(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.25099

6. Barroso, J. M., Matos, V. Y., & Aguilar, S. (2019). Análisis de los recursos, usos y competencias tecnológicas del profesorado universitario para comprender y mejorar el proceso de aprendizaje del alumnado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 80(1), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8013466

7. Cabero, J., Roig-Vila, R., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2017). Conocimientos tecnológicos, pedagógicos y disciplinares de los futuros docentes según el modelo TPACK. RCUB Revistes Científiques de La Universitat de Barcelona, 32, 73–84. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/16981

8. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2018). Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A cross-sectional study from Spain. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1528997

9. Cejas-León, R., & Navío, A. (2018). ICT training of university teachers. Influential factors on transfer to teacher’s job. Profesorado, 22(3), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.8002

10. Chieng, Y. E., & Tan, C. K. (2021). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Malaysian science teachers’ survey and perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1517

11. Da Silva, J. B., Bilessimo, S. M., & Machado, L. (2021). Integração de tecnologia na educação: Proposta de modelo para capacitação docente inspirada no TPACK. Educação Em Revista, 37, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/01024698232757

12. Dalal, M., Archambault, L., & Shelton, C. (2021). Fostering the growth of TPACK among international teachers of developing nations through a cultural exchange program. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5964

13. Fierro, M., Morales Vásquez, M., Norambuena Díaz, D., Bravo González, B., & Contreras Poblete, P. (2021). Objetivos priorizados del eje de lectura en la región del Maule, Chile: problemáticas y desafíos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 86(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8614295

14. Fuentes, J. L., Albertos, J. E., & Torrano, F. (2019). Towards the mobile-learning in the school: Analysis of critical factors on the use of tablets in Spanish schools. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2019_20_a3

15. Gil-Quintana, J., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2020). Citizenship training through SMOOCs: A participative and intercreative learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208301

16. Golubeva, T. I. (2020). Video conferencing and webinars: Integration of online tools in traditional forms of educational and scientific activities. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 4241–4244. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/11942020

17. Gonzalez, M., & Mohamad, G. A. (2022). Virtual literacy instruction: An investigation of how elementary educators exhibited TPACK during COVID-19 school closures. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202216914

18. Gordillo, A., López-Pernas, S., & Barra, E. (2019). Effectiveness of MOOCs for teachers in safe ICT use training. Comunicar, 27(61), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C61-2019-08

19. Granados Maguiño, M. A., Romero Vela, S. L., Rengifo Lozano, R. A., & Garcia Mendocilla, G. F. (2020). Technology in the educational process: New scenario [Tecnología en el proceso educativo: Nuevos escenarios]. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(92), 1809–1823. https://n9.cl/p6v0g

20. Herrera Nieves, L., Crisol Moya, E., & Montes Soldado, R. (2019). A MOOC on universal design for learning designed based on the UDL paradigm. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 35. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5508

21. INTEF. (2017). Marco común de competencia digital docente. https://intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017_1024_MarcoComunCompeDigiDoceV2.pdf

22. Istiningsih, I. (2022). Impact of ICT integration on the development of vocational high school teacher TPACK in the digital age 4.0. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6642

23. López-Meneses, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Bernal-Bravo, C., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2020). Strengths and weaknesses of massive open online courses (MOOC) in comparison to other teaching models by using socio-educational contexts. Formación Universitaria, 13(6), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.4067/S071850062020000600077

24. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

25. Mohamad Nasri, N., Husnin, H., Mahmud, S. N. D., & Halim, L. (2020). Mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: A snapshot from Malaysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers’ education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802582

26. Monjelat, N., Peralta, N., & Martín, P. S. (2020). Saberes y prácticas con TIC: ¿Instrumentalismo o complejidad? Un estudio con maestros de primaria argentinos. Perfiles Educativos, 43(171), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.22201/IISUE.24486167E.2021.171.59225

27. Muhaimin, M., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Saudagar, F., Pratama, R., Wahyuni, S., Sadikin, A., & Indrayana, B. (2019). A sequential explanatory investigation of TPACK: Indonesian science teachers’ survey and perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.662

28. Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., Marandi, S. S., & Wang, S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010

29. Novita, R., & Herman, T. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it helpful? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027

30. Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2019). Massive open online courses in the initial training of social science teachers: Experiences, methodological conceptions, and technological use for sustainable development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030578

31. Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2020). MOOCs and NOOCs in the training of future geography and history teachers: A comparative cross-sectional study based on the TPACK model. IEEE Access, 8, 4035–4042. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963314

32. Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (2020). EFL teachers’ perceptions on the potential of MOOCs for lifelong learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 15(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2020100101

33. Pedrosa, I., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & García-Cueto, E. (2014). Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: Avances teóricos y métodos para su estimación [Content validity evidences: Theoretical advances and estimation methods]. Acción Psicológica, 10(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.5944/ap.10.2.11820

34. Rajprasit, K. (2022). Design and development of an English as a global language MOOC to increase global Englishes awareness: Evaluation in a Thai university. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2801-09

35. Ramírez Martinell, A., Casillas Alvarado, M. Á., & Aguirre González, I. R. (2018). Habilitación tecnológica de profesores universitarios y docentes de educación básica. Apertura (Guadalajara, Jal.), 10(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.18381/ap.vl0n2.1368

36. Rap, S., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Aviran, E., Shvarts-Serebro, I., Easa, E., Yonai, E., Waldman, R., & Blonder, R. (2020). An applied research-based approach to support chemistry teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3278–3284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00687

37. Sampaio, D., & Almeida, P. (2016). Pedagogical strategies for the integration of augmented reality in ICT teaching and learning processes. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.240

38. Sosa-Díaz, M. J., & Fernández-Sánchez, M. R. (2020). Massive open online courses (MOOC) within the framework of international developmental cooperation as a strategy to achieve sustainable development goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310187

39. Tiba, C., & Condy, J. (2021). Newly qualified teachers’ integration of technology during curriculum delivery. International Journal of Education and Practice, 9(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2021.92.297.309

40. Villarreal-Villa, S., García-Guliany, J., Hernández-Palma, H., & Steffens-Sanabria, E. (2019). Teacher competences and transformations in education in the digital age. Formación Universitaria, 12(6), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600003

41. Walan, S. (2020). Embracing digital technology in science classrooms—Secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6

42. Zeng, Y. (2022). Analysing teacher knowledge for technology use among secondary teachers teaching Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) in Australia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n2p15

license

How to Cite

Guzmán González, J. R., & Vesga Bravo, G. J. (2025). Evaluation a NOOC oriented to the development of digital educational contents from the TPACK framework. Revista Interamericana De Investigación Educación Y Pedagogía RIIEP, 17(2), 53-82. https://doi.org/10.15332/z1tk0435

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...