Consideraciones de la co-mediación en el proceso de la mediación

Cristhel Denisse  Chan Landero

doi:10.22490/25394088.5312

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021)

Published 2021-08-19

license

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

When the Publicaciones e Investigaciones Journal receives an original study or article from its author(s), whether by email, postal service, or the platforms available for said purpose, know that it may be published in physical or electronic formats in national or international archives, databases, or SIRES. As such, Publications and Research authorizes the reproduction and citation of said material, provided that the description of information is carried out in conformity with bibliographic norms, and mention the corresponding names, authors, article, issue, and pages. Publications and Research, in advance, expresses that the information, concepts, and methods are the responsibility of the author(s). As such, the UNAD does not have any influence whatsoever over that expressed in the manuscript.

Theoretical article

Considerations of co-mediation in the mediation process

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/25394088.5312

Cristhel Denisse Chan Landero Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco

PDF (Spanish)

HTML (Spanish)

Abstract
References

Alternative justice in the Mexican State establishes the human right of access to justice, based on heterocompositive and self-positive mechanisms, in the latter, there are alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation. In which a voluntary process is carried out by the parties involved and the role of the facilitator called mediator, is neutral and impartial in the process, however, the figure of the co-mediator, contributes to the processes strengthening confidence, increasing the actions capable of carrying out in the resolution of the conflict. Derived from this, this document identifies elements and considerations of co-mediation in the mediation process.

keywords: facilitator, alternative justice, mediation

Cámara de Diputados. (2021). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.

Cámara de Diputados. (2014). Ley nacional de mecanismos alternativos de solución de controversias en materia penal.

Congreso del Estado de Tabasco. (2013). Ley de acceso a la justicia alternativa para el Estado de Tabasco.

Córdova Mendoza, Karen Tatiana, Ochoa Espinoza, Amanda Magdaly, & Durán Ocampo, Armando Rogelio. (2019). Algunas consideraciones sobre la mediación y arbitraje. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 11(4), 287-295.

Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación. (2019). Justicia alternativa. Características de la co-mediación como parte del procedimiento de mediación. Tesis: I.3o.C.395 C (10a.).

Gerónimo, P, Silva, F. y Martínez, G. (2021). Mecanismos alternativos en la solución de conflictos para la construcción de una cultura de paz. Revista ciencias de la documentación 7(1), 15-23.

Mazo, H.M. (2013). La mediación como herramienta de la justicia restaurativa. Opinión jurídica, 12(23), 99-114.

Luján Henríquez, Isabel; Rodríguez Mateo, Heriberto & Rodríguez Trueba, Carlos. (2015). Perfil del mediador. Modelo interactivo integrador de mediación. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 491-499.

Silva-Hernández, Francisca. (2020). Hacia una comprensión del conflicto en justicia alternativa. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindío, 32(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol32n1.435

license

How to Cite

Chan Landero, C. D. . (2021). Considerations of co-mediation in the mediation process. Publicaciones E Investigación, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22490/25394088.5312

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...