Derechos de autor 2024 Publicaciones e Investigación

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Cuando PUBLICACIONES E INVESTIGACIÓN recibe la postulación de un original por parte de su autor, ya sea a través de correo electrónico o postal, considera que puede publicarse en formatos físicos y/o electrónicos y facilitar su inclusión en bases de datos, hemerotecas y demás sistemas y procesos de indexación. PUBLICACIONES E INVESTIGACIÓN autoriza la reproducción y citación del material de la revista, siempre y cuando se indique de manera explícita el nombre de la revista, los autores, el título del artículo, volumen, número y páginas. Las ideas y conceptos expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad de los autores y en ningún caso reflejan las políticas institucionales de la UNAD
Notas sobre el tránsitoepistemológico de la inteligencia artificial (AIai)
La inteligencia artificial (IA) ha transitado por múltiples paradigmas que han cambiado drásticamente la comprensión humana de estas tecnologías. Originalmente basada en reglas simbólicas, la IA ha migrado hacia enfoques conexionistas, con un auge actual de las redes neuronales y el aprendizaje profundo. Esta ponencia analiza este tránsito epistemológico, examinando debates éticos y conceptuales contemporáneos sobre las capacidades de las máquinas. Indiscutiblemente nos encontramos en una singularidad histórica, con desafíos aún abiertos para comprender los fundamentos de la nueva IA.
Alevizos, V., Georgousis, I., Simasiku, A., Messinis, A., Karypidou, S., & Malliarou, D. (2024). Evaluating the Inclusiveness of Artificial Intelligence Software in Enhancing Project Management Efficiency—A review and examples of quantitative measurement methods. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences, and Applications, ACDSA 2024. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACDSA59508.2024.10467463
Al-Hassan, M.-A. (2023). Revolutionizing Methods and Methodologies: Advancing Indigenous-Centered Research Methodologies in User Experience Research (UXR), Technical and Professional Communication Practice. 103-109. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/3615335.3623018
Anderson, M. M. (2024). AI as Philosophical Ideology: A Critical look back at John McCarthy’s Program. Philosophy and Technology, 37(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00731-1
Berman, M. (1986). The cybernetic dream of the twenty-first century. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 26(2), 24-51. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167886262003
Cáceres, E. (2011). Steps toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition. En Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues (Vol. 13). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599844.003.0025
Cantarini, P. (2022). FOR AN ETHICS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED ON POIETHICS. Revista Juridica, 4(71), 892-912. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v4i71.6170
Cariani, P. (1993). To evolve an ear. Epistemological implications of gordon pask’s electrochemical devices. Systems Research, 10(3), 19-33. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850100305
Ceccon, L. (2023). Image Learning at the Crossroads Between Human and Artificial Intelligence: A Revived Centrality of Images in Cognition. 631 LNNS, 1038-1049. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25906-7_114
Christy, L. F. (2022). What is Intelligence? The Looming Philosophical Question behind Artificial Intelligence. Voprosy Filosofii, 2022(10), 208-212. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-10-208-212
Cristianini, N. (1995). Evolution and learning: An epistemological perspective—On some conceptual problems shared by artificial life and artificial intelligence. Axiomathes, 6(3), 429-437. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02228987
Cukurova, M. (2018). A Syllogism for Designing Collaborative Learning Technologies in the Age of AI and Multimodal Data. 11082 LNCS, 291-296. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_22
Dascal, M. (1989). Artificial intelligence and philosophy: The knowledge of representation. Systems Research, 6(1), 39-52. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3850060106
Dias, P. (2019). Can practice based knowledge be formalized? En SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology (pp. 103-116). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1271-1_8
Dixon-Román, E., & Parisi, L. (2020). Data capitalism and the counter futures of ethics in artificial intelligence. Communication and the Public, 5(3-4), 116-121. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320972029
Duan, W. (2023). The Challenge of Artificial Intelligence Scientists to the Epistemology of Science. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 35(11), 4-12. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0849
Eden, A. H. (2007). Three paradigms of computer science. Minds and Machines, 17(2), 135-167. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-007-9060-8
Efimov, A. R., Ageeva, A. V., Krainov, A. G., Fedorov, A. K., Kardymon, O. L., & Starikov, P. P. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Science: On the Threshold of a New Field of Knowledge? Voprosy Filosofii, 2024(4), 30-41. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-4-30-41
Fowler, T. B. (2021). The Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Light of Zubiri’s Noology. Quaestio, 21, 233-258. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.128394
Freyberg, S., & Hauser, H. (2023). The morphological paradigm in robotics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 100, 1-11. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.002
Garcia-Aguilar, G. (2024). The Strange and Promising Relationship Between EEG and AI Methods of Analysis. Cognitive Computation, 16(5), 2411-2419. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10142-7
Gauld, C., & Micoulaud-Franchi, J.-A. (2021). Network analysis by systemic text excavation of the concept of personalized psychiatry and precision. Encephale, 47(4), 341-347. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2020.08.008
Goodfellow, I. G., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. C. (2016). Deep learning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=740537
Hallsworth, J. E., Udaondo, Z., Pedrós-Alió, C., Höfer, J., Benison, K. C., Lloyd, K. G., Cordero, R. J. B., de Campos, C. B. L., Yakimov, M. M., & Amils, R. (2023). Scientific novelty beyond the experiment. Microbial Biotechnology, 16(6), 1131-1173. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14222
Heiden, B., Tonino-Heiden, B., & Alieksieiev, V. (2022). System Ordering Process Based on Uni-, Bi- and Multidirectionality – Theory and First Examples. 107, 594-604. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92632-8_55
Irwin, R., & White, T. H. (2019). Decolonising Technological Futures: A dialogical tryptich between Te Haumoana White, Ruth Irwin, and Tegmark’s Artificial Intelligence. Futures, 112. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.06.003
Le Moigne, J.-L. (2002). On the exceptional epistomological manifesto: Symbols and Search. Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 16(1-2), 251-268. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3166/ria.16.251-268
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2278-2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791
Lee, S. E., Ju, N., & Lee, K.-H. (2023). Service chatbot: Co-citation and big data analysis toward a review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122722
Luger, G. F. (2021). Knowing our world: An artificial intelligence perspective (p. 256). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71873-2
Magnani, L. (1995). Creative Processes in Scientific Discovery. European Journal of High Ability, 6(2), 160-169. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445940060260
Mariotti, S. (2021). Forging a new alliance between economics and engineering. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 48(4), 551-572. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-021-00187-w
Mariotti, S. (2022). The economics–engineering nexus: Response to the commentaries. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 49(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-021-00203-z
McGranaghan, R. M. (2024). Complexity Heliophysics: A Lived and Living History of Systems and Complexity Science in Heliophysics. Space Science Reviews, 220(5). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01081-2
Mikhaylovskiy, N. (2020). How do you test the strength of ai? 12177 LNAI, 257-266. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52152-3_27
Minsky, M. (1961). Steps toward Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the IRE, 49(1), 8-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1961.287775
Minsky, M., & Papert, S. A. (2017). Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11301.001.0001
Ovalle, A., Subramonian, A., Gautam, V., Gee, G., & Chang, K.-W. (2023). Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness. 496-511. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604705
Raza, S. A. (2022). A paradigm shift to ethical decision-making—Incorporating systemic epistemology into complex socio-technical decision support systems research. Journal of Decision Systems, 32(1), 177-200. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.2015840
Reizinger, P. (2023). The Falsificationist View of Machine Learning. Informacios Tarsadalom, 23(2), 117-127. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22503/INFTARS.XXIII.2023.2.7
Rhode, W., & Morik, K. (2022). Introduction. En Discovery in Physics (pp. 1-29). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85147942407&partnerID=40&md5=d7d8ab5fd57ac9bae987ad54855ad088
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519
Rumelhart, E., D., Mcclelland, J., & L., J. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1. Foundations.
Shedlock, K., & Hudson, P. (2022). Kaupapa Māori concept modelling for the creation of Māori IT Artefacts. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 52(S1), 18-32. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2070223
Silano, J. A. (2024). Towards abundant intelligences: Considerations for Indigenous perspectives in adopting artificial intelligence technology. Healthcare Management Forum, 37(5), 329-333. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241257144
Souza, M. (2020). Towards a Theory of Hyperintensional Belief Change. 12320 LNAI, 272-287. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61380-8_19
Sukkar, A. W., Fareed, M. W., Yahia, M. W., Mushtaha, E., & de Giosa, S. L. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Islamic Architecture (AIIA): What Is Islamic Architecture in the Age of Artificial Intelligence? Buildings, 14(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030781
TURING, A. M. (1950). I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE. Mind, LIX(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Van Gigch, J. P. (1990). Systems science, the discipline of epistemological domains, contributes to the design of the intelligent global web. Behavioral Science, 35(2), 122-137. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830350205
Van Gigch, J. P., & Le Moigne, J. L. (1989). A paradigmatic approach to the discipline of information systems. Behavioral Science, 34(2), 128-147. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830340203
Varkey, P., & Gmytrasiewicz, P. (2011). Resource bounded decision-theoretic bargaining with finite interactive epistemologies. 2, 219-225. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79960117569&partnerID=40&md5=779c2d4d5cc199a6862184e9a4245d41
Viniegra-Velázquez, L. (2020). Colonialism, science, and health. Boletin Medico del Hospital Infantil de Mexico, 77(4), 166-177. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.20000069
Derechos de autor 2024 Publicaciones e Investigación

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Cuando PUBLICACIONES E INVESTIGACIÓN recibe la postulación de un original por parte de su autor, ya sea a través de correo electrónico o postal, considera que puede publicarse en formatos físicos y/o electrónicos y facilitar su inclusión en bases de datos, hemerotecas y demás sistemas y procesos de indexación. PUBLICACIONES E INVESTIGACIÓN autoriza la reproducción y citación del material de la revista, siempre y cuando se indique de manera explícita el nombre de la revista, los autores, el título del artículo, volumen, número y páginas. Las ideas y conceptos expresados en los artículos son responsabilidad de los autores y en ningún caso reflejan las políticas institucionales de la UNAD