Cuando el patrimonio cultural pertenece a Estados y expertos: un análisis crítico de la difusión de normas de la Unesco

Maria Camila Ballesteros Materon

doi:10.22490/26655489.8083

Análisis Jurídico - Político Volumen 6 Número 12

Vol. 6 No. 12 (2024): Julio - Diciembre

Published 2024-07-30

license

Artículos de reflexión

When cultural heritage belongs to States and experts. a critical analysis of Unesco’s norm diffusion

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/26655489.8083

Maria Camila Ballesteros Materon Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

Our idea of heritage is related to certain principles of which some international agencies such as Unesco are promoters. These principles have to do with defending the “intrinsic” value of cultural heritage based on universalist justifications. This article seeks to show that legitimized readings of cultural legacy tend to promote visions that homogenize international discussions in this matter. Furthermore, it will be seen how the game rules in heritage are unilaterally produced by States and technocratic networks. From the above, a question arises regarding the possibilities of harmonizing a one-way narrative of heritage with the Sustainable Development Goals. The analysis strategies are, on the one hand, offering a panoramic view of the most relevant literature on heritage. On the other hand, to propose how, based on a genealogical methodology, power relations in heritage discourse can be exposed. Finally, in the last section I propose to clarify the relationship between the protection of cultural heritage and their compliance with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

keywords: Cultural Heritage, Global South, Norm Diffusion, The 2030 Agenda

Aalberts, T. y Golder, B. (2012). On the Uses of Foucault for International Law. Leiden journal of international law, 3(25), 603–608.

Cameron, C. y Rössler, M. (2013). Many Voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World. Routledge.

Golder, B. (2023). International Law and the Politics of Genealogy. Global Intellectual History, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2023.2183881

Foucault, M. (1980). Power / Knowledge: Selected interviews an. The Harvester press.

Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. En G. Burchell, C. Gordon y P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.

Fricker, M. (2017). Injusticia epistémica. Herder Editorial, Print.

Goodman, R. y Jinks, D. (2013). Socializing states: Promoting human rights through International Law. Oxford University Press.

Hellemeyer, A. (2012). Michel Foucault: episteme, dispositivo y prácticas. IV Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología XIX Jornadas de Investigación VIII Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.

Irr, C. (2008). World Heritage Sites and the Culture of the Commons en Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World. UBC Press.

Kearins, K. y Hooper, K. (2002). Genealogical method and analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(5), 733- 757. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210448984smith

Labadi, S. y Logan, W. (2015). Approaches to urban heritage, development and sustainability. En S. Labadi y W. Logan (eds.), Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainabilit (pp. 1-20). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Lixinski, L. (2013). Intangible Cultural Heritage in International Law. Oxford University Press.

Lixinski, L. (2019). International Heritage Law for Communities: Exclusion and reimagination. Oxford University Press.

Maraña, M. y Roldán, R. (2020). Patrimonio Cultural y Desarrollo: una mirada a la Agenda 2030 y el rol del patrimonio. Periférica Internacional. Revista Para El análisis De La Cultura Y El Territorio, (21), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.25267/Periferica.2020.i21.15

Meskell, L. (2015). Transacting UNESCO World Heritage: Gifts and exchanges on a global stage. Social Anthropology, 23(1): 3–21.

Prebisch, R. (1988). Dependencia, interdependencia y desarrollo. Revista de la Cepal. Naciones Unidas.

Smith, L. (2004). Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage. Routledge.

Smith, L. (2010). Uses of heritage (repr.). Routledge.

Vilaró, M. (1998). Relaciones de poder en la crisis de la UNESCO : un análisis desde la geopolítica. Documents d’anàlisi geogràfica, 33, 215-228.

license

How to Cite

Ballesteros Materon, M. C. (2024). When cultural heritage belongs to States and experts. a critical analysis of Unesco’s norm diffusion: un análisis crítico de la difusión de normas de la Unesco. Análisis Jurídico Político, 6(12), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.22490/26655489.8083

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Archivos descargados