Métodos de Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental en Colombia

Javier Toro Calderón; Renson Martínez Prada; Gabriela Arrieta Loyo

doi:10.22490/21456453.990

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2013)

Published 2013-07-01

license

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

Artículos de Investigación

Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment in Colombia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.990

Javier Toro Calderón Instituto de Estudios Ambientales-IDEA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá. Colombia.

Renson Martínez Prada Secretaría Departamental de Desarrollo Agropecuario y Sostenible de Arauca. Arauca, Colombia.

Gabriela Arrieta Loyo Departamento de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Central, Facultad de Ingeniería. Bogotá, Colombia

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Colombia constitutes the primary tool for making decisions with respect to projects, works and activities (PWA) with potential for significant environmental impacts. In the case of the infrastructure of the PWA, the EIA is mandatory and determines the environmental license (EL) for construction and operation. This paper analyzes the methods used to assess the environmental impact of the PWA that have applied for licenses with the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development. It was found that the method most frequently used is the qualitative proposal by Conesa, with modifications that reduce the effectiveness of the EIA and favor the subjectivity and bias of the evaluator. Finally a series of recommendations to improve the process in the country are proposed.

keywords: methodologies of environmental impact assessment, environmental impact studies, Colombia

Arboleda, J. (1998). Una propuesta para la identificación y evaluación de impactos ambientales, En: Manual de eva¬luación de impactos ambientales de Colombia. 1-16. Bogotá: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, CORMAGDALENA, Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).

Barker, A. & Wood C. (1999). An evaluation of EIA sys¬tem performance in eight EU countries. Environ Impact Asses Rev., 19 (4): 387-404.

Canter, L. (2000). Environmental Impact Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Canter, L. & Sadler, B. (1997). A tool kit for effective EIA practice: review of methods and perspectives on their application. Norman:: Environmental Ground Water Institute University of Oklahoma Institute of Environmental Assessment; Lincoln: International Association for Impact Assessment.

Conesa V. (2006). Guía metodológica para la evaluación del impacto ambiental. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa Libros.

Contraloría General de la República (CGR). (2006). Estado de los recursos naturales y el ambiente 2005– 2006. Bogotá: CGR.

Corning, P. (1998). The synergism hypothesis: on the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of com-plex systems. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 21 (2): 133-172.

Corning, P. (1995). Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems. Syst Res. 12 (2): 89-121.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 2811 de 1974. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 1974.

Diario Oficial. Ley 99 of 1993. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 1993.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 1753 de 1994. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 1994.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 1728 de 2002. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 2002.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 1180 de 2003. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 2003.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 1220 de 2005. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 2005.

Diario Oficial. Decreto 2820 de 2010. Bogotá, Imprenta Nacional, 2010.

Diario Oficial. Ley 1450 de 2011. Bogotá, Imprenta Na¬cional, 2011.

Duarte, O. (2000). Técnicas difusas para evaluación de impacto ambiental. Tesis de Doctorado. Granada: Uni¬versidad de Granada.

Duarte, O., Requena, I. & Rosario, Y. (2007). Fuzzy Techniques for Environmental Impact Assessment in the Mineral Deposit of Punta Gorda (Moa, Cuba). Environ Technol., 28 (6): 659-69.

Duinker, P. & Beanlands, G. (1986). The significance of environmental impacts: an exploration of the concept. Environmental Management, 10 (1): 1-10.

Leopold, L., Clarke, F., Hanshaw, B. & Balsley, J. (1971). A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. Washington: Geological Survey Circular 645, United States Department of the Interior

Martínez, R. (2010). Propuesta metodológica para la Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental en Colombia. Bogotá: Maestría en Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo. Universi¬dad Nacional de Colombia.

MAVDT. (2010). Metodología general para presentación de Estudios Ambientales. Bogotá: MAVDT.

Modak, P. & Biswas, A. (1999). Conducting environmental impact assessment in developing countries. Toronto: United Nation University Press.

Ortolano, L. & Sheperd, A. (1995). Environmental im¬pact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Asses., 13 (1): 3-30.

Ramírez, M. (2009). Bolívar y la legislación protectora del ambiente. Anu Derecho., 26: 15-24.

Rychlik, I. & Rydén, J. (2006). Probability and Risk Analysis. An Introduction for Engineers. New York: Springer.

Sadler, B. (1996). International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment: final report. Ottawa: International Association for Impact Assessment and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ministry of Supply and Services.

Tennøy, A., Kværner, J. & Gjerstad, K. (2006). Uncertainty in environmental impact assessment predictions: the need for better communication and more transpa¬rency. Impact Assess Proj Apprais., 24 (1): 45-56.

Thompson, M.A. (1990). Determining Impact Significance in EIA: a Review of 24 Methodologies. J Enviro Manage., 30 (3): 235-250.

Toro, J. (2009). Análisis constructivo del proceso de evaluación de impacto ambiental en Colombia. Propuestas de mejora. Tesis Doctoral. Granada: Departamento de Ingeniería Civil. Universidad de Granada.

Toro, J., Duarte, O., Requena, I. & Zamorano, M. (2012). Determining Vulnerability Importance in Environmental Impact Assessment. The case of Colombia. Environ Im¬pact Asses Rev., 32 (1): 107-117.

Toro, J., Requena, I. & Zamorano, M. (2010). Environ¬mental impact assessment in Colombia: critical analy-sis and proposals for improvement. Environ Impact Asses Rev., 30 (4): 247-261.

Unión Mundial para la Naturaleza (UICN). (2003). Manual técnico de EIA: fundamentos generales para Centroamérica. San José: CCAD, UICN, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de los Países Bajos.

Wathern, P. (1994). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Biddles Ltd, Guilford and King’s Lynn.

Wood, C. (2003). Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. London: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Wood, C. (1993). Environmental impact assessment in Victoria: Australian discretion rules EA. J Environ Manage., 39 (4): 281-95.

Wood, C. & Coppell, L. (1999). An evaluation of the Hong Kong environmental impact assessment system. Impact Assess Proj Apprais., 17 (1): 21-31.

license

How to Cite

Toro Calderón, J., Martínez Prada, R., & Arrieta Loyo, G. (2013). Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment in Colombia. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 4(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.990

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...