Ciencia de la sostenibilidad, sus características metodológicas y alcances en procesos de toma de decisiones

Walter Alfredo Salas-Zapata; Leonardo Alberto Ríos-Osorio

doi:10.22490/21456453.987

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013)

Published 2013-01-15

license

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

Artículos de Investigación

Sustainability science, its methodological characteristics and reach in decision-making processes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.987

Walter Alfredo Salas-Zapata Grupo de investigación Salud y Sostenibilidad. Escuela de Microbiología. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia

Leonardo Alberto Ríos-Osorio Grupo de investigación Salud y Sostenibilidad. Escuela de Microbiología. Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

The transition toward sustainability is the set of changes and decisions a group of people make in order to resolve problems of sustainability. To address these problems a scientific trend has emerged called sustainability science, which has been considered to be a science inspired by the use of knowledge and must have characteristics such as transdisciplinarity, participation, social learning, coproduction of knowledge, as well as consider multiple perspectives and scales of problems and the uncertainty inherent to them. However, scientific research plays a particularly important role in the decision making processes. The chances of success greatly increase when permits interaction and communication between researchers and decision makers, or other actor. This paper analyzes how the characteristics in question contribute to the promotion of changes toward sustainability.

keywords: methodology, participation, policies, sustainability, transdisciplinarity.

Almeida, C., & Bascolo, E. (2006). Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 22: (S7-19) (S20-33).

Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Introduction. In F. J. C. C. F. Berkes (Ed.), Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Boulanger, P., & Brechet, T. (2005). Models for policymaking in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecological Economics, 55(3): 337-350.

Clark, W., & Dickson, N. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS, 100 (14): 8059 - 8061.

Espinosa, A., Harnden, R., & Walker, J. (2008). A complexity approach to sustainability – Stafford Beer revisited. European Journal Of Operational Research, 187 (2): 636-651.

Fafard, P. (2008). Evidence and Healthy Public Policy: Insights from Health and Political Sciences (Vol. Mayo). Quebec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy.

Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 2 (2): 14 - 21.

Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems. Global Environ Chang, 16 (3): 253 - 267.

Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the postnormal age. Futures, 25 (7): 739-755.

Gallopin, G. (2004). Sustainable development: epistemological challenges to science and technology.

Paper presented at the Workshop on Sustainable Development: Epistemological Challenges to Science and Technology, Santiago de Chile.

Gallopín, G. (2001, December). Science and technology, sustainability and sustainable development. (LC/R.2081/I). ECLAC.

Gómez-Arias, R., Orozco, D., Rodríguez, F., & Velasquez, W. (2006). Políticas públicas en salud: relación

entre investigación y decisión. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública, 24 (2): 105-118.

Grosskurth, J. (2007). Ambition and reality in modeling: a case study on public planning for regional sustainability. Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 3 (1): 3-11.

Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., & Nykvist, B. (2009). Rationalising the policy

mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process. Environment and Planning, 41 (5): 1185-1200.

Hirsch, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60 (1): 119-128.

Holling, C. (1996). Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystem, and incentives for people. Ecol Appl, 3: 733-735.

Holling, C. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4: 390 - 405.

Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3 (2): 215-239.

Kates, R., Clark, W., Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., . . . Svedin, U. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517): 641-642.

Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustain Sci Pract Policy, 3 (2): 5-14.

Komiyama, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2006). Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1 (1): 1-6.

Luks, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2007). Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance. Ecological Economics, 63 (2-3): 418-426.

Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustainability Sci Practice Policy, 2 (1): 36 - 41.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). Los límites del crecimiento (Vol. Primera). Nueva York: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. (2008). Introduction. In J. Norberg & G. Cumming (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 1-14). New York: Columbia University Press.

Novo, M. (2006). El desarrollo sostenible. Su dimensión ambiental y educativa (First ed.). Madrid: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Rapport, D. (2007). Sustainability science: an ecolhealth perspective. Sustainability Science, 2 (1): 77-84.

Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions toward sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3 (4): 275 - 284.

Rios, L., Ortiz, M., & Álvarez, X. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16 (1): 48-60.

Torgerson, D. (2003). Entre el conocimiento y la política: tres caras del análisis de política [1986]. In L. Aguilar (Ed.), El estudio de las políticas (pp. 197-238). México D.F.: Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa

license

How to Cite

Salas-Zapata, W. A., & Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2013). Sustainability science, its methodological characteristics and reach in decision-making processes. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 4(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.987

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...