Carbono orgánico de la hojarasca en los bosques de la reserva de la Biósfera Mariposa Monarca, caso santuario sierra Chincua, México

Rodolfo Serrato Cuevas; Salvador Adame Martínez; José López García; David Flores Román

doi:10.22490/21456453.905

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2014)

Published

2014-01-07

PDF (Spanish)

How to Cite

Serrato Cuevas, R., Adame Martínez, S., López García, J., & Flores Román, D. (2014). Organic carbon of the litter in the forests of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, sierra Chincua, México sanctuary case. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 5(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.905

Download Citation

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Organic carbon of the litter in the forests of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, sierra Chincua, México sanctuary case

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.905

Section

Artículos de Investigación

Rodolfo Serrato Cuevas Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex).

Salvador Adame Martínez Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEMex).

José López García Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

David Flores Román Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

It was estimated the percentage of organic carbon (CO) and CO captured in the leaf litter of the sierra Chincua forest in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. The sampling of the litter was carried out in eight places, from a square of 0.25 m2 (50 cm x 50 cm), in the laboratory it was determined the total percentage of CO, proving to the site 3 and 9 L horizon and a range of 26.59 to 54.26 % and the rest of places and horizon F, range of 36.32 to 40.41 %. The CO stored in t ha-1, at the level of horizons, the F varies from 8.82 to 35.96 t ha-1, the L varies between 1.41 and 34.10t ha-1. At place level, the 2, 3 and 9 varies between 1.41 and 8.82 t ha-1, in the other places it varies between 22.97 to 35.96 t ha-1. Without a statistical difference in the sampling place, horizons and physiography for percent and storage of organic carbon (F = 0.0776 , 0.7270 , 0.3157 for % CO and F = 0.8265 , 0.5807 , 0.3915 for CO stored) respectively. In comparison of averages, in the sampling places there are five groups of the percent of CO, ranging from 26.59 to 54.26 %, for carbon stored there is no statistical difference. It was concluded that the percentage of carbon from the litter presents wide variation in the percentages of CO and stored CO by the litter in t ha-1

litter, physiography, horizons L and F, carbon storage

Bond-Lamberty & Thomson Al. (2010). Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Journal name: Nature Volume: 464, Pages: 579–582

Burés, S. (2004). La Descomposición de la Materia Orgánica. [Documento en línea]. Recuperado de: http:// www.inforganic.com/node/484

Casanova, E. (2005). Introducción a la Ciencia del Suelo. Venezuela. Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico – Universidad Central de Venezuela.

Conolly, W. & Corea, S. (2007). Cuantificación de la captura y almacenamiento de carbono en sistemas agroforestales y forestales en seis sitios de cuatro municipios de Nicaragua. Universidad Nacional Agraria. Facultad de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente, Trabajo de Diploma. Managua, Nicaragua.

Corbella, R. & Fernández de Ullivarrí, J. (2006). Materia Orgánica del Suelo. Argentina. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia – Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.

Delgadillo Ramírez Marcela & Quechulpa Montalvo Sotero. (2006). Manual de Monitoreo de carbono en Sistemas agroforestales, Quechulpa Montalvo. AMBIO, S.C de R.L. México.

DOE/SC-108. (2008). “Carbon Cycling and Biosequestration, Integrating biology and climate through systems science: Report from the March 2008 Workshop,” U.S.

Ecoplexity. (2010). Porcentaje de materia orgánica. Portland State University. Teaching ecological complexity, 2 pag.

Faculty of Land and Food System. (2012). Soil Classification. The university of British Columbia.

Figueroa, C.l. (2001). Comparación de la concentración de carbono en diferentes tipos de vegetación en la sierra norte de Oaxaca” tesis profesional Chapingo, Texcoco, México.

Freitas, L., Otárola, E., Del Castillo, D., Linares, C., Mar tínez, P. & Malca, G. (2006). Servicios ambientales de almacenamiento y secuestro de carbono del ecosistema aguajal en la reserva nacional Pacaya Samiria, Loreto - Perú, Documento técnico N° 29. Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana, 65pp.

García S. D, Honorio, C. E. & Del Castillo D. (2012). Determinación del stock de carbono en aguajales de la cuenca del río Aguaytía, Perú. Ucayali. Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana. Vol. 21 N° 1-2. 153-160.

Garduño, N. (2011). Diagnostico Fitosanitario Forestal en la Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca en el Estado de México. Gobiernos del Estado de México.

Gayoso, J. (2002). Medición de la capacidad de captura de carbono en bosques nativos y plantaciones de Chile. Universidad Austral de Chile. Revista Forestal Iberoamericana Vol. 1 N° 1.

Heath, L.S., Birdsey, R.A. & Williams D.W. (2002): Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States. Environ. Pollut., 116: 373-380.

Honorio, C., Eurícide, N. & Baker Timothy, R. (2010). Manual para el monitoreo del ciclo del carboo en bosques amazónicos. Insituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana. Universidad de Leeds. Lima, 54 p.

Hopkins, M. F., Torn, S. M. & Trumbore, E. S. (2012). Warming accelerates decomposition of decades-old carbon in forest soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, June 11, 2012 DOI: 10.1073/ pnas.1120603109.

Houghton, R. A. (2007) Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35:313-47. 10.1146/ annurev .earth.35.031306.140057

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007, the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Released in four sections: Working Group I Report: The Physical Science Basis; Working Group II Report: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; Working Group III Report: Mitigation of Climate Change; and The Synthesis Report: Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Kutsch W., Bahn M. & Heinemeyer, A. (2009). Soil Carbon Dynamic: an integrated methodology Cambridge University Press. New York.

Lavelle, P. & Spain, A. V. (2005). Soil Ecology. Published by Springer. Netherlands.

Lonsdale, W. M. (1988). “La predicción de la cantidad de hojarasca en los bosques del mundo”. Annals of Botany 61 (3): 319-324.

López, G. J. (2009). “Análisis de cambio en la cobertura forestal en la zona núcleo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca: 2003 – 2006”. En: R. Aguirre (Coord.) “Conceptos de Geomática y estudios de caso en México”. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México. 365 pp.

NASA. (2011). The Carbon Cycle, updated primer by NASA Earth Observatory, 2011

Oleson, K.W., D.M. Lawrence, G.B. Bonan, M.G. Flanner, E. Kluzek, P.J. Lawrence, S. Levis, S.C. Swenson, P.E. Thornton, A. Dai, M. Decker, R. Dickinson, J. Feddema, C.L. Heald, F. Hoffman, J.-F. Lamarque, N. Mahowald, G.-Y. Niu, T. Qian, J. Randerson, S. Running, K. Sakaguchi, A. Slater, R. Stockli, A. Wang, Z.-L. Yang, Xi. Zeng, & Xu. Zeng, (2010): Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-478+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 257 pp.

Prentice, I.C. (2001). “The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide”. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / Houghton, J.T. [edit.] Retrieved 31 May 2012.

Pritchard, S.G. (2011). “Soil organisms and global climate change,” Plant Pathology 60:82-99.

Pritchet, W.L. (1986). Suelos Forestales: propiedades, conservación y mejoramiento. Noriega. Ed. Limusa. 643 pp.

Rattan, Lal. (2008). “Sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in global carbon pools”. Energy and Environmental Science 1: 86–100.

Rügnitz, M.T; Chacón, M.L; Porro R. (2009). Guía para la determinación de carbono en pequeñas propiedades rurales. Manual técnico 11. 1ed. Lima, Perú. Centro Mundial Agroforestal (ICRAF). 79 pag.

Scheleger, B., Gayoso, J. & Guerra, J. (2001). Manual de procedimientos para inventarios de carbono en ecosistemas forestales. Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia.

Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos (SARH). (1978). Cálculo del clima de acuerdo al segundo sistema de Thornthwaite. Subdirección de Agrología. Publicación Num. 7. Segunda edición. México.

U.S. Department of Energy’s, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, (2013). Belowground Carbon Cycling Processes at the Molecular Scale. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

University of California - Irvine. (2012). “Global warming threat seen in fertile soil of northeastern U.S. forests.” Science Daily. Science Daily.

Vanguelova, E. I., Nisbet, T. R., Moffat, A. .J., Broadmeadow, S., Sanders, T. G. M. & Morison, J. I. L. (2013). A new evaluation of carbon stocks in Britis forest soils. Soil Use and Management. Volume 29, Issue 2, pages 169-181.

Download Citation

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

Published

How to Cite

Organic carbon of the litter in the forests of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, sierra Chincua, México sanctuary case

Most read articles by the same author(s)

H5

Keywords