Variación somaclonal y selección in vitro con toxinas como herramienta en la búsqueda de resistencia a enfermedades en plantas: Revisión

Carlos Patiño Torres

doi:10.22490/21456453.893

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010)

Published 2010-05-07

license

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

Artículos de Investigación

Somaclonal variation and in vitro selection with toxins as a tool in the search for resistance to plant diseases: A review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.893

Carlos Patiño Torres Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

Allelic diversity is a fundamental requirement for successful plant breeding programs. When gene pool is limited, several mechanisms are available for variability enrichment, for example, obtaining somaclonal variants through in vitro techniques. Somaclonal variation is a natural phenomenon that occurs in the procedures of plant tissue culture, through is possible to recover mutants with or without adaptive advantages. When this phenomenon is used to generate mutants with specific traits, through the use of an agent of artificial selection, the process is called in vitro selection. When looking for generating plant material that is resistant/tolerant to diseases, the agent of choice may be the causative organism, its parts, or its metabolic products, including toxins. Considerations of cost, simplicity and efficiency, make this technique particularly suitable for developing countries. In this paper, we review the scientific basis underpinning this method.

keywords: In vitro selection, Plant disease resistance, Plant tissue culture, Somaclonal variation

Arora, A., R.K. Sairam & G.C. Srivastava. 2002. Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants. Current Science 82: 1227-1238

Barroso, P.A.V., G.E.D.D. Moura,, L.K.F. Brito, C.P. Martins, C.E.C. Macedo, D.B. Lopes & M.A.I. Alloufa. 2003. Efeito do cultivo in vitrona presença de NaCl em plantas de abacaxizeirona fase de aclimatação. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 7: 473-477

Bhatia, P., N. Ashwath, T. Senaratna & D. Midmore. 2004. Tissue culture studies of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 78: 1-21

Borras, O., A.R. Santos, A.P. Matos, R.S. Cabral & M. Arzola 2001. A First attempt to use a Fusarium subglutinans culture filtrate for the selection of pineapple cultivars resistant to fusariose disease. Plant Breeding, 120: 435-438

Cassells, A.C. & Curry, R.F. 2001. Oxidative stress and physiological, epigenetic and genetic variability in plant tissue culture: implications for micropropagators and genetic engineers. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 64: 145- 157

Collonnier, C.,I. Fock, V. Kashyap,G.L. Rotino, M.C. Daunay, Y. Lian, I.K. Mariska, M.V. Rajam, A. Servaes, G. Ducreux & D. Sihachakr. 2001. Applications of biotechnology in eggplant. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture65: 91- 107

Dantas, A.C.M., G.R.L. Fortes, J.B. da Silva, A.N. Nezi & A.C. Rodrigues. 2001. Tolerância ao alumínio em porta-enxertos somaclonais de macieira cultivados em solução nutritiva. Pesq. agropec. bras. 36: 615-623

Daub, M.E. 1986. Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 24: 159-186

Dugdale, L.J.,A.M. Mortimer,S. Isaac & H.A. Collin. 2000. Disease response of carrot and carrot somaclones to Alternaria dauci. Plant Pathology 49: 57-67

Gomes-Oliveira, I.V. & A.T.S. Matsumura. 2001. Técnica de obtenção de filtrado de cultura de Alternaria solani. Fitopatol. bras. 26: 102

Heslop-Harrison, J.S., A. Brandes,S. Taketa, T. Schmidt, A.V. Vershinin,E.G. Alkhimova, A. Kamm, R.L. Doudrick,T. Schwarzacher, A. Katsiotis,S. Kubis, A. Kumar, S.R. Pearce, A.J. Flavell, & G.E. Harrison. 1997. The chromosomal distributions of Ty1-copia group retrotransposable elements in higher plants and their implications for genome evolution. Genetica 100: 197-204

Jain, S.M. 2001. Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118: 153-166

Jayasankar, S. 2005. Variation in tissue culture. In: Trigiano, R. & Gray, D. J. (Editors). Plant development and biotechnology. CRC Press, LLC, USA. 358 pp

Jayasankar, S. & D. Gray. 2003. In vitro selection for disease resistance in plants-an alternative to genetic engineering. AgBiotechNet Vol. 5 May ABN 111. 5 pp.

Jayasankar, S., R. Litz., D.J. Cray & P. Moon. 1999. Responses of embriogenic mango cultures and seedlings to bioassays to a partially purified phytotoxin produced by a mango leaf isolate of Colletotrichum gloeosporiodes Penz. In Vitro Cell.

Dev. Biol. Plant 35: 475-479

Jelenic, S., J. Berljak, , D. Papes, & S. Jelaska. 2001. Mixoploidy and chimeric structures in somaclones of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Bintje. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 39: 13-17

Joyce, S.M., Cassells, A. C. & Jain, S. M. 2003. Stress and aberrant phenotypes in in vitro culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 74: 103-121

Karp, A. 1995. Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 295-302

Kubis, S.E., A.M.M.F. Castilho,A.V. Vershinin & P.S. Heslop-Harrison. 2003. Retroelements, transposons and methylation status in the genome of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and the relationship to somaclonal variation. Plant Molecular Biology 52: 69-79

Kumar, A. & J.L. Bennetzen. Plant retrotransposons. Annual Review of Genetics 33: 479-532

Larkin, P.J, & W.R. Scowcroft 1981. Somaclonal variation-a novel source of variability from cell culture for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet, 60: 197-214

Lee, M. & R. Phillips.1988. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 39: 413-437

Lestari, E.G. 2006. In vitro selection and somaclonal variation for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance. Biodiversitas 7(3): 297-301

Lucas, J.A. 1998. Plant pathology and plant pathogens. Third edition. Blackwell Science Ltd. 274 pp.

Mitchell, R.E. 1984. The relevance of non-hostspecific toxins in the expression of virulence by pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 22: 215-245

Nyange, N.E., B. Williamson, R.J. McNicol, J.D. Lyon & C.A. Hackett. 1995. In vitro selection of Coffea arabica callus for resistance to partially purified phytotoxic culture filtrates from Colletotrichum kahawae. Annals of Applied Biology, 127: 425-439

Okole, B., C. Memela, S. Rademan & K.J. Kunert. 2000. Non-conventional breeding approaches for banana and plantain improvement against fungal diseases at Aeci. Acta Hort. 540: 207- 214

Osbourn, A.E. 2001. Tox-boxes, fungal secondary metabolites, and plant disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98:

-14188

Patiño Torres, C. 2010. Producción in vitro de pectinasas por Colletotrichum acutatum. Acta Agronómica 59: 80-90

Patiño Torres, C., R. Hoyos Sánchez & L. Afanador Kafuri. 2007. Selección y regeneración in vitro de somaclones de tomate de árbol (Solanum betacea cav. Sendt) utilizando filtrados de cultivo de Colletotrichum acutatum con actividad pectinasa. Rev. Fac. Nal. Agr. Medellín 60: 3923-3937

Pringle, R.B. & R.P. Scheffer. 1964. Host-Specific Plant Toxins. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2: 133-156

Sánchez-Chiang, N. & V. Jiménez. 2009. Técnicas moleculares para la detección de variantes somaclonales. Agronomía Mesoamericana 20(1): 135-151.

Strobel, G.A. Phytotoxins. 1982. Annual Review of Biochemistry 51: 309-333

Thomma, B.P.H.J. 2003. Alternaria spp.: from general saprophyte to specific parasite. Molecular Plant Pathology 4: 225-236

Turner, B.M. 2001. Chromatin and gene regulation. Blackwell Science Ltd. 284 pp.

Ulisses, C., T.R. Camara, L. Willadino, I. Meunier, P.S. Gomes da Rocha & C. Albuquerque. 2000. Seleção in vitro de gemas de bananeira ‘nanicão’ tolerantes à salinidade. Scientia Agricola 57: 667-670

Ulisses, C., T.R. Camara, L. Willadino, C.C. de Albuquerque, L.S.S. Martins & N.S.A. de Freitas. 2002. Caracterização isoenzimática

de clones de bananeira nanicão submetidos à salinidade. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 6: 358-361

Walton, J.D. 1996. Host-selective toxins: agents of compatibility. The Plant Cell 8: 1723-1733

Yoder, O.C. 1980. Toxins in pathogenesis. Annual Review of Phytopathology 18: 103-129

license

How to Cite

Patiño Torres, C. (2010). Somaclonal variation and in vitro selection with toxins as a tool in the search for resistance to plant diseases: A review. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 1(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.893

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...