Published 2024-06-14
license
Área Agrícola

Implementation of fog catchers as an alternative for water supply in the municipality of Tuluá

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.6740
Eyder Fabian Jaramillo Arenas Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Giovany Tascon Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Karol Andrea Leal Vásquez Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Valentina Lamus Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Luisa Cabezas Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Vivian Orejuela Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Contextualization: Since the 20th century, water consumption has increased globally. This increasing is due to the fact that there is currently a high demand in developed countries and in those with rising economies. Another problem is population growth worldwide, which generates indiscriminate water use in the agricultural, livestock and industrial sectors; which generates an increasing in the use water.

Knowledge gap: Fog catchment systems (fog catchers) become a useful alternative for taking advantage of the water resource available in the environment for subsequent storage and distribution in different human development activities. However, in Colombia there is a lack of studies that can be related to the implementation of these artisanal systems.

Purpose: In this research, the relevance of the use of four fog catchers with different percentages in the polyshade, are located in the Vijal and Alto Bonito properties, which correspond to an ecosystem zone of sub-Andean forest, was investigated with the aim to determinate the viability of this tool in the water collection.

Methodology: A randomized complete block design was carried out and, using Duncan's test, it was determined if there were significant differences between the polyshade percentages used and the height of the plots.

Results and conclusions: As a result, it was obtained that polyshade of 65%, captured 980 ml corresponding to the Alto Bonito property; while in the Vijal, the fog catch was 784 ml. The mesh with 80% polyshade, captured 990 ml in the Alto Bonito property, while in Vijal, the fog catch was 794 ml. There is no significant difference to obtain water related to polyshadows. In relation to the difference in the properties altitude, there is a significant difference; the water average accumulated in the Vijal property is 25.5 ml/day, while in Alto Bonito, it is 31.8 ml/day.

keywords: Fog catcher, Sub- Andean Forest, water harvesting, shade cloth, sustainable drinking water
license

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

How to Cite
Jaramillo Arenas, E. F. ., Tascón Ortiz, G. ., Leal Vásquez, K. A., Lamus Molina, V., Cabezas Burbano, L. F. ., & Orejuela, V. M. . (2024). Implementation of fog catchers as an alternative for water supply in the municipality of Tuluá. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 15(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.6740
Almétricas
Metrics
Archivos descargados
424
Jun 16 '24Jun 19 '24Jun 22 '24Jun 25 '24Jun 28 '24Jul 01 '24Jul 04 '24Jul 07 '24Jul 10 '24Jul 13 '2484
|

PRIVACY STATEMENT: In accordance with the Personal Data Protection Law (Law 1581 of 2012), the names and email addresses managed by RIAA will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other individual. Manuscripts submitted to the publication are only accessible to the editorial team and external peer reviewers.

Design and implemented by