Rizobacterias promotoras de crecimiento vegetal (PGPR): una revisión sistemática 1990-2019

Anny Posada; Diana Mejía; Diana  Polanco-Echeverry; Jaiberth Cardona

doi:10.22490/21456453.4040

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021)

Published 2021-06-02

Anexo (Spanish)

license

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

When RIAA receives the postulation of an original by its author, either through email or post mail, considers that it can be published in physical and/or electronic format and facilitates its inclusion in databases, newspaper archives and other systems and indexing process. RIAA authorizes the reproduction and citation of the Journal’s material, provided that explicitly indicates journal name, the authors, the article title, volume, number and pages. The ideas and concepts expressed in the articles are responsibility of the authors and in no case reflect the institutional policies of the UNAD.

Área Ambiental

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a systematic review 1990-2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.4040

Posada, A.

Mejía, D.

Polanco-Echeverry, D.

Cardona, J. Universidad de Antioquia

PDF (Spanish)

Visor (Spanish)

HTML (Spanish)

XML (Spanish)

Epub (Spanish)

Movil (Spanish)

Abstract
References

Research gap: Information is often scattered and to date there is no systematic analysis that allows an accurate description of studies about PGPR, which represents a limitation in further experimental research developments.

Purpose: Describe the main applications of PGPR in original research worldwide.

Methodology: The systematic review was carried out in three multidisciplinary databases following the Cochrane and PRISMA recommendations. Completeness, reproducibility and quality assessment were guaranteed. The analyzes were based on frequencies and 95% confidence intervals for the proportions

Results and conclusions: 2,525 studies were identified and only 160 met the selection protocol. The majority of studies are from India, the main microbial genera described were Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter, the most investigated PGPR mechanisms were indolacetic acid production (AIA), phosphate solubilization, antagonism and siderophores production. The most frequent plant species in the studies were corn, tomato, wheat and rice, in which the main effects of the PGPR were related weight and length of the root and the plant in general. It is concluded that this review identified the genres of PGPR, mechanisms of action PGPR and plant species of greater frequency in the studies, useful variables to summarize the evidence in this field and identify the main lines of action in future research aimed at improving health, crop production and environmental sustainability.

keywords: PGPR, sustainable agriculture, crops, beneficial microorganisms, biocontrol, nutrient availability, studies systematization

AMIS Agricultural Market Information System. (2018). Amis-Outlook.org. https://app.amis-outlook.org/#/market-database/supply-and-demand-overview

Amaresan, N., Jayakumar, V., Kumar, K., y Thajuddin, N. (2019). Biocontrol and plant growth-promoting ability of plant-associated bacteria from tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) under field condition. Microbial Pathogenesis, 136, 103713 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103713

Andy, A., Masih, S. y Gour, V. (2020). Isolation, screening and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from rhizospheric soils of selected pulses. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101685

Arshad, M., y Frankenberger, W.T. (1998). Plant-Growth-Regulating Substances in the Rhizosphere: Microbial Production and Functions. Advances in Agronomy, 62, 45-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60567-2

Braga, L.F., Oliveira, F.A., Couto, E.A., Santos, K.F., Ferreira, E.P., y Martin-Didonet, C.C. (2018). Polyphasic characterization of bacteria obtained from upland rice cultivated in Cerrado soil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 49, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.004

Bakker, P.A.H.M., Ran, L.X., Pieterse, C.M.J., y Van Loon, L.C. (2003). Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 25, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309507043

Bowen, G.D., y Rovira, A. D. (1999). The Rhizosphere and Its Management to Improve Plant Growth. Advances in Agronomy, 66, 1-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60425-3

Chart, H. (2012). Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus and other enterobacteria: Pneumonia, urinary, tract infection; opportunist infection. Medical Microbiology, 8, 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-4089-4.00042-1

Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano. (2012). Manual cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de intervenciones. http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269

Dede, A., Güven K., y Şahi N.N. (2020), Isolation, plant growth-promoting traits, antagonistic effects on clinical y plant pathogenic organisms and identification of actinomycetes from olive rhizosphere. Microbial Pathogenesis, 143,104-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104134

De Gregorio, P. R., Michavila, G., Ricciardi Muller, L., de Souza Borges, C., Pomares, M. F., Saccol de Sá, E. L., Pereira, C., y Vincent, P. A. (2017). Beneficial rhizobacteria immobilized in nanofibers for potential application as soybean seed bioinoculants. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176930

Deshpande, T. (2017). State of Agriculture. PRS Legislative Research. https://prsindia.org/policy/analytical-reports/state-agriculture-india

Dijun, Z., Weina, H., Qianqian, T., Jun, Z., y Xiurong., S. (2016). Multi-omics analysis in the pathogenicity of Enterobacter cloacea ENHKU01 isolated from swage outfalls along the Ningbo coastline. Proteome Science 14, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-016-0104-y

Etesami, H., y Maheshwari, D.K. (2018). Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, 156, 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.013

Glick, B.R., y Bashan, Y. (1997). Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of phytopathogens. Biotechnology Advances, 15, 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(97)00004-9

Glickmann, E., y Y., Dessaux. (1995). A Critical Examination of the Specificity of the Salkowski Reagent for Indolic Compounds Produced by Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 793-96. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.61.2.793-796.1995

Guang-Can, T., Shu-Jun, T., Miao-Ying, C., y Guang-Hui, X. (2008). Phosphate-Solubilizing and -Mineralizing Abilities of Bacteria Isolated from Soils. Pedosphere, 18(4), 515–523. https://doi.10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60042-9

Howell, C., y Stipanovic, R. (1979). Control of Rhizoctonia solani on cotton seedlings with Pseudomonas fluorescens and with an antibiotic produced by the bacterium. Phytopathology, 69, 480-482. https://doi.10.1094/Phyto-69-480

Howell, С., y Stipanovic, R. (1980). Suppression of Pythium ultimium induced damping off of cotton seedlings by Pseudomonas fluorescens and its antibiotic pyoluterin. Phytopathology, 70,712-715. https://doi.10.1094/Phyto-70-712

Hynes, R.K., Leung, G.C., Hirkala, D.L., y Nelson, L.M. (2008). Isolation, selection, and characterization of beneficial rhizobacteria from pea, lentil, and chickpea grown in western Canada. Canadian Journal Microbiology, 54(4), 248-258. https://doi.10.1139/W08-008

Jewell, M.C., Campbell, B.C., y Godwin, I.D. (2010). Transgenic Plants for Abiotic Stress Resistance. Transgenic Crop Plants. https://doi.10.1007/978-3-642-04812-8_2

Karthiba, L., Saveetha, K., Suresh, S., Raguchander, T., Saravanakumar, D., y Samiyappan, R. (2010). PGPR and entomopathogenic fungus bioformulation for the synchronous management of leaffolder pest and sheath blight disease of rice. Pest Management Science, 66(5), 555–564. https://doi.10.1002/ps.1907

Kloepper, J.W. (1993). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in agricultural and environmental Management. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents (Metting, F.B., Jr. Ed., pp. 255-274). Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Kraus, J., y Loper, J. (1992). Lack of evidence for a role of antifungal metabolite production by Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5 in biological control of Pythium damping-off of cucumber. Molecular Plant Pathology, 82(3), 264-271. https://doi.10.1094/Phyto-82-264

Lavakush, Yadav, J., Verma, J. P., Jaiswal, D. K., y Kumar, A. (2014). Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecological Engineering, 62, 123–128. https://doi.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.013

Liu, Z., Li, Y. C., Zhang, S., Fu, Y., Fan, X., Patel, J. S., y Zhang, M. (2015). Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from calcareous soils. Applied Soil Ecology 96, 217–224. https://doi.10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.003

Martínez, L.L, Martínez Peniche, R.A., Hernández Iturriaga, M., Arvizu Medrano, S.M., y Pacheco Aguilar, J.R. (2013). Caracterización de rizobacterias aisladas de tomate y su efecto en el crecimiento de tomate y pimiento. Revista fitotecnia mexicana, 36(1), 63-69. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-73802013000100007&lng=es&tlng=es

Mahmood, S., Daur, I., Al-Solaimani, S.G., Ahmad, S., Madkour, M.H., Yasir, M., Hirt, H., Ali, S., y Ali, Z. (2016). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and silicon synergistically enhance salinity tolerance of mung bean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 876. https://doi.10.3389/fpls.2016.00876

Mehnaz, S., Mirza, M.S., Haurat, J., Bally, R., Normand, P., Bano, A., y Malik, K.A. (2001). Isolation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis of the beneficial bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 47(2), 110-117. https://doi.10.1139/w00-132

Mhatre, P. H., Karthik, C., Kadirvelu, K., Divya, K. L., Venkatasalam, E. P., Srinivasan, S., Ramkumar, G., Saranya, C., y Shanmuganathan, R. (2018). Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A potential alternative tool for Nematodes bio-control. International Society of Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 17, 119-128. https://doi.10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.009

Morgado González, A., Espinosa Victoria, D., y Gómez Merino, F.C. (2015). Efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in sugarcane. Terra Latinoamericana, 33(4), 321-330. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-57792015000400321&lng=es&tlng=

Mukhtar, S., Shahid, I., Mehnaz, S., y Malik, K. (2017). Assessment of two carrier materials for phosphate solubilizing biofertilizers and their effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Microbiological Research, 205, 107-117. https://doi.10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.011

Oteino, N., Lally, R.D., Kiwanuka, S., Lloyd, A., Ryan, D., Germaine, K.J., y Dowling, D.N. (2015). Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 745-754. https://doi.10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745

Padan, E. (2008). The enlightening encounter between structure and function in the NhaA Na+–H+ antiporter. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 33(9), 435-443. https://doi.10.1016/j.tibs.2008.06.007

Pérez-Pazos, J.V y Sánchez-López, D.B. (2017). Caracterización y efecto de Azotobacter, Azospirillum y Pseudomonas asociadas a Ipomoea Batatas del Caribe Colombiano. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología, 19(2), 35-46. https://doi.10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v19n2.69471

Pliego, C., Lugtenberg, B., y Kamilova, F. (2011). Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Bacteria: Fundamentals and Exploitation en D.K. Maheswari (Ed). Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Ecosystems (pp. 295-344). Springer.

Posada, L., Ramírez, M., Ochoa-Gómez, N., Cuellar-Gaviria, T.Z., Argel-Roldan, L.E., Ramírez, C., y Villegas-Escobar, V. (2016). Bioprospecting of aerobic endospore-forming bacteria with biotechnological potential for growth promotion of banana plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 212, 81-90. https://doi.10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.040

Ramamoorthy, V., Viswanathan, R., Raguchander, T., Prakasam, V., y Samiyappan, R. (2001). Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Protection, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00056-9

Rizvi, A., y Khan, M.S., (2018). Heavy metal induced oxidative damage and root morphology alterations of maize (Zea mays L.) plants and stress mitigation by metal tolerant nitrogen fixing Azotobacter chroococcum. Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, 157, 9–20. https://doi.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.063

Sandhya, V., Ali, S.Z., Grover, M., Reddy, G., y Venkateswarlu, B. (2010). Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 62(1), 21-30. https://doi.10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4

Schroth, M.N. y Becker, J.O. (1990). Biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens [Presentación en papel, pp. 389-414]. 5th Internacional Congress of Plant Pathology, Kyoto, Japan.

Urrutia, G., y Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511.

Uzoh, I. M., y Babalola, O.O. (2018). Rhizosphere biodiversity as a premise for application in bio-economy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 265, 524-534. https://doi.10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.003

Van Loon, L.C, Baker, P.A.H.M., y Pieterse, C.M.J. (1998). Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annual Rewiew of Phytopathology, 36(1), 453-483. https://doi.10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453

Wezel, A., y Soldat, V. (2009). A quantitative and qualitative historical analysis of the scientific discipline of agroecology. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7, 3-18. https://doi.10.3763/ijas.2009.0400

Whipps, J.M. (2001). Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 487-511. https://doi.10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487

World Bank. (2012). India: Issues and Priorities for Agriculture. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/05/17/india-agriculture-issues-priorities

Xiang, N., Lawrence, K.S., Kloepper, J.W., Donald, P.A., y McInroy, J.A. (2017). Biological control of Heterodera glycines by spore-forming plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on soybean. PLoS ONE, 12(7). https://doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0181201

Xie, Y., Wu, L., Zhu, B., Wu, H., Gu, Q., Rajer, F.U., y Gao, X. (2017). Digital gene expression profiling of the pathogen-resistance mechanism of Oryza sativa 9311 in response to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 induction. Biological Control, 110, 89-97. https://doi.10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.04.009

Zahir, Z., Arshad, M., y Frankenberger, W.T. (2003). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 81, 97-168. https://doi.10.1016/S0065-2113(03)81003-9

license

How to Cite

Posada, A., Mejía, D., Polanco-Echeverry, D. ., & Cardona, J. (2021). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a systematic review 1990-2019. Revista De Investigación Agraria Y Ambiental, 12(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.4040

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...