Evaluación del equipo FE-5 vs. técnica de Ritchie con muestras fecales de manipuladores de alimentos en cinco ciudades del país

Astrid Carolina Flórez Sánchez; Ibeth Paola Garzón Gordillo; Omar Andrés Reyes Torres; Orlando Ruda Hernández

doi:10.22490/24629448.429

Vol. 7 No. 12 (2009)

Published 2009-12-15

license

Research Article (before OJS)

Evaluation of FE-5 team Ritchie vs. technique faecal samples of food handlers in five Colombian cities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.429

Astrid Carolina Flórez Sánchez Instituto Nacional de Salud. Laboratorio de Parasitología

Ibeth Paola Garzón Gordillo Instituto Nacional de Salud. Laboratorio de Parasitología

Omar Andrés Reyes Torres Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca

Orlando Ruda Hernández Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca

PDF (Spanish)

Abstract
References

The objective of this study was evaluate the effectiveness of the team DiaSys FE-5 instrument used as a new concentration technique for intestinal parasite analysis that facilitates the preparation, centrifugation, concentration, and mounting of samples for perusal, which is composed of a Mini Parasep system that optimizes the recovery and concentration of cysts, eggs and larvae in comparison to the traditional technique of modified Ritchie (formalin-ether). 764 fecal samples from food handlers were examined in five cities.

The samples were simultaneously processed and analyzed by the technique of Ritchie and the team DiaSys FE-5. Ritchie’s technique and equipment DiaSys FE-5 allowed the discovery of protozoa and helminths, parasitology, with a kappa concordance index of 0.90, a factor that indicates that the results were similar. This helps to confirm that the computer DiaSys FE-5 is a useful and safe tool in the laboratory for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites, obtaining lower cost benefits, reagents, time and most importantly for the professional bio and improvement of parasitological diagnosis.

keywords: biosecurity, intestinal parasites, parasitological diagnosis, protozoa.

Castro A, Guerrero O. Técnicas de diagnóstico parasitológico. 2a ed. Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad De Costa Rica; 2006.

Botero D, Restrepo M. Parasitosis humanas 4a ed. Medellín: Corporación para Investigaciones Biológicas; 2003.

Navarro P, López A, Hernández A, Jiménez L, Reyes H. Diarreas parasitarias: epidemiología y clínica de casos representativos. Rev Fund José María Vargas. 1990;14:13-16.

Pardo M, Valdés Y, González M, Jiménez A, Santesteban A, Gispert F. Utilización de la Técnica de Ritchie Modificada en el Diagnóstico de Protozoos. http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/mciego/vol7_01_01/articulos/a6_v7_0101.html .

Bellmunt-Montoya S. Validación de pruebas diagnósticas. Angiología 2007; 59:433–438.

Rochem Biocare. Manual de instrucción y mantenimiento del equipo Diasys FE-5.

Molinero L. Medidas de concordancia para variables cualitativas. Asociación De La Sociedad Española De Hipertensión. 2001.

Salvalleta R, Eiralé C. Examen coproparasitario: metodología y empleo. Revisión técnico metodológica. Rev Med Uruguay 1996;12:215-223.

Devera R., Blanco Y., Requena., Velásquez V. Diagnóstico de Blastocystis hominis bajo rendimiento de los métodos de concentración de forol-éter y sedimentación espontánea. Rev Biomed 2006; 17(3):231-233.

license

How to Cite

Flórez Sánchez, A. C., Garzón Gordillo, I. P., Reyes Torres, O. A., & Ruda Hernández, O. (2009). Evaluation of FE-5 team Ritchie vs. technique faecal samples of food handlers in five Colombian cities. NOVA Biomedical Sciences Journal, 7(12), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.429

Download Citation

Almétricas

Metrics

File downloads

254

Declaración de privacidad.

Evaluation of FE-5 team Ritchie vs. technique faecal samples of food handlers in five Colombian cities

Declaración de privacidad.