Published 2005-12-15
license
Article (before OJS)

Application of Indicators of Knowledge Has More Than Enough Biodiversity for Diagnose and Comparison of Biological Collections

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.336
Martha Yaneth Vallejo Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología. Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS).
José Alberto Acosta Rueda PhD Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología. Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS).

Most biological collections from Colombian museums lack diagnosis, which prevent to anmize and to know it real state in qualitative and quantitative terms. To solve this problem it has been proposed some biodiversity indicators, which can be used on biological collections data bases, allowing museums to define it condition, priorities and to register it contribution to country biodiversity.
There are basic criteria to elaborate indicators such as: scientific validation, data availability and reliability; the later including representativity, sensibility, simplicity, relevance and utility among others. They are necessary to support each indicator as part of the methodological sheet. The indicators proposed are used to compare the same biological group: (i). Between different collections; as this study case: Museo Javeriano - MUJ against Museo de Historia Natural Marina de Colombia- MHNMC and (ii). One Museum against a total reported for the country or the world.

The indicators used were: representativity and complementarity, both in taxonomic as in geographic terms; danger species; taxonomy identification; data completeness, sampled intensity, and metadata index. The indicators showed the following results for the MUJ collection: registred species 30 hermatipic corals; absent species, 52 ahermatipic corals; sampling in three ecoregions in the country, temporal, 91.6% of the material collected recently, 2004; spatial distribution of the specimens collected, 6 ecoregions along the colombian Caribbean; taxonomic representativeness, 50% against MHNMC and 26% against a total documented in the Caribbean; curatory level, 94.4% material identify to species; danger species included in the collection, 17.6%; family with more repetitions, Faviidae, and most representative; Agariciidae. The use of indicators increases the collection utility, disclosure (country biodiversity) and specialization through the documented information. They allows museums to make diagnosis for each collection in order to establish management priorities and optimization of the economical resources.

keywords: biodiversity indicators, diagnostic, biologic collection, museum, scleractinias, Colombian Caribbean.
license
How to Cite
Vallejo, M. Y., & Acosta Rueda PhD, J. A. (2005). Application of Indicators of Knowledge Has More Than Enough Biodiversity for Diagnose and Comparison of Biological Collections. NOVA Biomedical Sciences Journal, 3(4), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.336
Almétricas
Metrics
File downloads
1,237
Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 20269
|

PRIVACY STATEMENT: In accordance with the Personal Data Protection Law (Law 1581 of 2012), the names and email addresses managed by Revista NOVA will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other individual. Manuscripts submitted to the publication are only accessible to the editorial team and external peer reviewers.

Design and implemented by