Derechos humanos, derecho animal y crítica de la violencia especista: el lugar de la sintiencia

Iván Darío Ávila Gaitán

doi:10.22490/26655489.7271

Vol. 6 No. 11 (2024): Enero - Junio

Published

2024-01-31

PDF (Spanish)

Visor (Spanish)

HTML (Spanish)

XML (Spanish)

Epub (Spanish)

Movil (Spanish)

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Human rights, animal rights, and criticism of speciesist violence

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/26655489.7271

Section

Artículos producto de Investigación

Iván Darío Ávila Gaitán Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia (UNAD)

The purpose of this article is to address the contemporary connection between animal rights, human rights, and the critique of speciesist violence. It is argued that this connection lies in sentience, which has been reconceptualized as the capacity for subjective experience or consciousness, in contrast to the Aristotelian and Cartesian traditions. In these traditions, regarding animals, sentience is sometimes perceived in an essentialist manner to legitimize a supposed natural inferiority and the resulting exploitation, while at other times, it is considered reactively disqualified. This contrasts with qualified sentience, which is associated with a reflective human self. With the contemporary reconceptualization of sentience, it is argued that it does not require a Cartesian-Kantian reflective self, but it does imply a mode of individuation from which someone can be affected, value their own life, and distinguish their experiences from those of others. In that specific sense, sentience is synonymous with consciousness. This approach provides a common foundation for human rights and animal rights since only beings that experience life as their own have the right to life, freedom, and bodily integrity. This, in turn, leads to questioning the current status of animals as things, goods, resources, or property. The article concludes by establishing a link between the critique of this status and the critique of speciesist violence. This violence is based on the establishment of boundaries that separate the human ego from the Other animal, relegated to the status of a thing, good, or ownership. According to this argument, in line with Jainist philosophy, it becomes evident that the construction of cultures of peace requires the recognition of both the basic rights for animals and the interspecific interdependence between humans and (other) animals.

animal rights, human ri, Jainism, peace, sentience, speciesism, violence

Aristóteles. (1983). De anima. Editorial Leviatán.

Aristóteles. (2004). Política (M. García Valdés, trad.). Gredos.

Barvalia, G. (ed.). (2012). Bhaqwan Mahavira’s precepts. Agama, an introduction. Global Jain Agam Mission.

Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness. (2012). The Francis Crick Memorial Conference: Consciousness in Humans and Non-Human Animals. University of Cambridge. https://tinyurl.com/28rkraa9

Cavalieri, P. (2001). The animal question: Why nonhuman animals deserve human rights. Oxford University Press.

Chapple, C. (2001). The living cosmos of Jainism: a traditional science grounded in environmental ethics. Daedalus, 130, 207-224. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/theo_fac/14

Descartes, R. (1990). Meditaciones metafísicas. Ediciones Universales.

Dunayer, J. (2004). Speciesism. Ryce Publishing.

Francione, G. (2000). Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? Temple University Press.

Kachanoski, R. (2013). La violencia especista es una violencia social como cualquier otra: racista, sexista, homófoba, etc. Ethical Magazine, (7), 6-17.

Kachanoski, R. (2016). Introducción a la violencia especista. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Críticos Animales, 3(1), 209-233.

Kant, I. (2012). La metafísica de las costumbres (A. Cortina y J. Conill Sancho, trad.). Tecnos.

Organización Mundial de Sanidad Animal – OIE. (2021). Código sanitario para los animales terrestres. https://tinyurl.com/mxpc5ras

Regan, T. (2003). Animal rights, human wrongs: an introduction to moral philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield.

Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.

Ryder, R. (1989). Animal revolution: changing attitudes towards speciesism. Blackwell.

Ryder, R. (2022). Especismo (1970) (Seguido de ‘Especismo: 50 años después’). En Ávila, I. y González, A, Glosario de resistencia animal(ista). Desde Abajo.

Sapontzis, S. (1987). Morals, reason, and animals. Temple University Press.

Singer, P. (1999). Liberación animal. Editorial Trotta.

Steiner, G. (2008). Animals and the moral community: mental life, moral status, and kinship. Columbia University Press.

Ávila Gaitán, I. D. (2024). Human rights, animal rights, and criticism of speciesist violence: the place of sentience. Análisis Jurídico - Político, 6(11), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.22490/26655489.7271

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Los autores aceptan que la publicación de sus trabajos se hace a título gratuito y que, por lo tanto, se excluye cualquier posibilidad de retribución económica, en especie o de cualquier índole, por la publicación, distribución o cualquier otro uso que se haga de ellos. Todo el contenido de esta revista, a excepción de donde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons.

Published

Human rights, animal rights, and criticism of speciesist violence

H5

Keywords