Los derechos de la naturaleza en la jurisprudencia colombiana e indiana

Acosta, A. (2008). ¿Tienen derechos los animales? La Insignia. https://bit.ly/3qNpFjh

Acosta, A., Martínez, E. (2018). Los Derechos de la Naturaleza como puerta de entrada a otro mundo posible. en Bagni, Silvia (a cura di), Come governare l’ecosistema? - How to govern the ecosystem? - ¿Cómo gobernar el ecosistema? 13-46. https://bit.ly/3nMjud4

Acosta, A, Martínez, E. (2009). El Buen Vivir. Una vía para el desarrollo. Abya Yala, Quito.

Amirante, D. (2012). Environmental Courts in Comparative Perspective: Preliminary Reflections on the National Green Tribunal of India, en Pace Envtl. L. Rev. (29), 441-469. https://bit.ly/3tKbzAU

Ávila, R. (2016). El neoconstitucionalismo andino. UASB, Quito.

Bagni, S. (2013). Dal Welfare State al Caring State?, en Bagni, Silvia (a cura di), Dallo Stato del bienestar allo Stato del buen vivir. Innovazione e tradizione nel costituzionalismo latinoamericano. Filodiritto, Bolonia, 19-59.

Bagni, S. (2017). Comparative law and… love: contro la globalizzazione del diritto, per la globalizzazione del giurista, en Annuario di diritto comparato e studi legislativi, 47-66.

Bavikatte, K, Bennett,T. (2015). Community stewardship: the foundation of biocultural rights. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 6(1), 7-29.

Baxi, U. (2016). Towards a climate change justice theory? Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 7(1), 7-31.

Bonilla-Maldonado, D. (2013). Constitutionalism of the Global South. The Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bustamante R., Francisco. (2019). “Derechos de la Naturaleza: Análisis crítico de la jurisprudencia constitucional”, en: Una década con Derechos de la Naturaleza. Instituto de Estudios Ecologistas del Tercer Mundo. Abya-Yala, Quito.

Cano Pecharroman, L. (2018). Rights of Nature: Rivers That Can Stand in Court. Resources, 7(1), 1- 14.

Carducci, M. (2017) Natura (diritti della), Dig. Disc. Pubbl. UTET, Milán.

Carducci, M., Castillo-Amaya, L. (2015). La Naturaleza como “Grundnorm” y “Tertium comparationis” del constitucionalismo global, en: Bustamante, Thomas et al. (orgs.), O funcionamento da Corte Constitucional: a interpretação constitucional, as práticas argumentativas, a teoria do direito e o comportamento judicial (pp. 211-226). Anais do I Congresso Internacional de Direito Constitucional e Filosofia Política, Belo Horizonte.

De Sousa Santos, B. (2009). Una Epistemología del Sur. La reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social. Siglo XXI, Buenos Aires.

Galeano, E. (2010). We Must Stop Playing Deaf to Nature, en: A.A.V.V., Does Nature have Rights? Transforming Grassroots Organizing to Protect People and the Planet. Pachamama Foundation, 2-3. https://bit.ly/3nF6O7Z

Informe Oxfam. (2018). Informe 2018. https://bit.ly/32lPPA8

Kotzé, L. (2017). Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portland.

Magalhães, P (2018). Common Home of Humanity. Our Common Home as a legal construction based on science”, en: Bagni, S (a cura di), Come governare l’ecosistema? - How to govern the ecosystem? - ¿Cómo gobernar el ecosistema? (pp. 121-140). Dipartimento di Scienze giuridiche, Università di Bologna. https://bit.ly/3rC0Upd

Martinez-Alier, J., Baud, M., Sejenovich, H. (2016). Origins and Perspectives of Latin American Environmentalism, en: de Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., Baud, M. (eds). Environmental Governance in Latin America (pp. 29-57). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Narain, V. (2017). Indian Court Recognizes Rivers as Legal Entities. Int’l J. Const. L. Blog https://bit.ly/3qMZhWI

Pou-Giménez, F. (2018). The Rights of Rivers and Forests and Apex Court Dynamics in Colombia: On Natural and Institutional Environments. Int’l J. Const. L. Blog. https://bit.ly/3rA6hoU

Stone. (1972). Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Southern California L.R., 45, 450-501.